RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-04890 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect foreign service time for an overseas deployment from 26 Aug 13 through 15 Dec 13. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: An overseas deployment is not being considered in his foreign service time on his DD Form 214 and is also missing from his Virtual Military Personnel Flight (Virtual MPF) record. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 6 Jan 07. On 31 Oct 14, the applicant was discharged with an honorable characterization of service and was credited with 7 years, 9 months, and 25 days of active service. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. A review of the applicant’s Master Personnel Records failed to provide any documentation to substantiate foreign service. The applicant submitted a travel voucher that does not contain the official stamp from finance which indicates it is a paid travel voucher and provided a copy of his temporary duty (TDY) orders which in itself does not provide proof of his foreign service. They are not authorized to accept a travel voucher that has not been stamped paid by the local finance office. The types of documents they can use are paid official travel vouchers, evaluation reports, letters of evaluation and decorations. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 1 Jul 15, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, due to the absence of official documentation that verifies his foreign service we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of persuasive evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-04890 in Executive Session on 8 Sep 15, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-04890 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 18 Nov 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 5 Mar 15. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Jul 15.