RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-05040 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His permanent change of station (PCS) orders, AH-043323, be changed to show that he was in a temporary duty (TDY) status while attending Joint Military Attaché School (JMAS). APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His PCS orders were generated in error. The orders should have stated he was TDY enroute; however, the losing installation along with the Air Force Personnel Center (AFPC) published the orders for a PCS. The losing installation stated they could not correct the order as they had maxed out the allowable number of amended orders. In order to make the change, they would need to cancel his assignment and generate new orders. This course of action would have put him in jeopardy of losing the assignment. This error has caused him and his family a great deal of stress. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant is active duty serving in the grade of master sergeant. Documentation provided by the applicant reflects he received PCS orders to Washington DC, with a report date of 28 April 2014. An amendment was published to authorize him to wear civilian clothes while in travel status enroute to his new duty station and to authorize concurrent travel of dependents. A second amendment was published to add the fund cite for the JMAS training. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPAA recommends denial. The applicant traveled to Washington DC for attaché training in a PCS status. His travel status should not be changed to TDY. The complete AFPC/DPAA evaluation is at Exhibit C. AFPC/DPAPP recommends denial. In accordance with AFI 36-2110, Assignments, para 4.6, when an airmen attends a course at one location and the official length of the course is 20 weeks or more, the airmen will attend in permanent change of station status. The complete AFPC/DPAPP evaluation is at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 1 July 2015 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion and find the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-05040 in Executive Session on 12 November 2015 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 5 Dec 15, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPAA, dated 5 May 15. Exhibit D. Memorandum, AFPC/DPAPP, dated 11 Jun 15. Exhibit E. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Jul 15. 1 2