RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-05201 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His general, under honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Since he did not receive a dishonorable discharge and served his country as well as anyone else, he would like his discharge upgraded to honorable. The Department of Veteran’s Affairs (DVA) led him to believe he received an honorable discharge which he needs in order to get disability benefits he applied for in 2008. He provides a copy of the DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge; he received in support of his application. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 31 May 71, the applicant entered the Regular Air Force. On 11 Feb 72, he received an Article 15, UCMJ. As punishment, he was ordered to forfeit $100.00 per month for two months and to perform 15 days of extra duty. On 28 Feb 72, according to Special Court-Martial Order No. 10, he pled guilty and was convicted by Special Court-Martial for being absent without authority on three separate occasions. He was found guilty of all specifications and received punishment of reduction to rank of airman basic (E-1), forfeiture of $100.00 per month for six months and confined at hard labor for six months. On 19 Sep 72, he was notified his commander was recommending he be furnished a general discharge under the provisions of AFM 39- 12, Separation for Unsuitability, Misconduct, Resignation or Request for Discharge for the Good of the Service, Chapter 2, Section A, Paragraph 2-4c. He acknowledged receipt indicating he would not submit a statement concerning the action taken against him. On 20 Sep 72, the applicant received a general, under honorable conditions, discharge and was credited with 1 year and 4 months of active service. On 29 Dec 14, a request for post-service information was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit C). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE BOARD: After careful consideration of applicant’s request and the available evidence of record, we find the application untimely. Applicant did not file within three years after the alleged error or injustice was discovered as required by Title 10, United States Code, Section 1552 and Air Force Instruction 36-2603. Applicant has not shown a plausible reason for the delay in filing, and we are not persuaded that the record raises issues of error or injustice which require resolution on the merits. Thus, we cannot conclude it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to file in a timely manner. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The application was not timely filed and it would not be in the interest of justice to waive the untimeliness. It is the decision of the Board, therefore, to reject the application as untimely. The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2014-05201 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 19 Dec 14, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Dec 14.