RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2015-00132 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect non-paid active duty points for the following periods: a.  30 – 31 December 2006 b.  14 – 31 January 2007 c.   5 – 28 February 2007 d.   1 – 7 March 2007 e.  10 – 31 March 2007 f.   1 April 2007 g.   9 – 31 July 2007 h.   1 – 31 August 2007 i.   1 – 7 September 2007 His records reflect that he waived all monetary compensation due to the correction of the non-paid active duty points. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His military records were corrected to reflect that he was continued on active duty from 30 December 2006 through 1 April 2007 and 8 June 2007 through 7 September 2007. However, he was receiving Veteran Affairs (VA) compensation during these same periods. It would appear that he was automatically paid active duty pay and benefits for these periods; however, he has only been paid for the days in which he reported and performed duties at his unit, and no other payments have been received. He is being accused by the Department of Veteran Affairs (DVA) of allegedly receiving VA compensation during the same periods he was receiving military pay and benefits because of the active duty periods reflected on his DD Form 214. In order to avoid a collection from the DVA, his DD Form 214 must be changed to reflect only the days for which he received military pay and benefits and the remaining days should be considered only for non-paid active duty points and not included on his DD Form 214. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 8 June 2007, the applicant was relieved from his current assignment and transferred to the retired reserve in the grade of master sergeant (E-7) to await retired pay at age 60. On 18 August 2011, the Board considered the applicant’s request that he be granted full compensation with corresponding points beginning 30 December 2006 to 7 September 2007. After considering all the facts and circumstances in his case, the Board granted partial relief. Based on the available evidence, his records were corrected to reflect that he was not released from active duty on 30 December 2006, but on that date he continued to serve on active duty until 1 April 2007 and from 8 June 2007 until 7 September 2007. For a complete accounting of the facts and circumstances of the original case, see the Record of Proceedings at Exhibit E. On 18 December 2014, the DVA notified the applicant that his compensation benefits for the period of 14 January 2007 through 1 April 2007 and 8 June 2007 through 7 September 2007 were stopped because he was receiving active or inactive duty training pay concurrently with his VA disability payments, causing an overpayment. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPTS recommends denial. The Air Force Board for Correction of Military Record’s (AFBCMR) previous recommendation to award the applicant medical continuation compensation to include pay and points, corrected an injustice that occurred when the applicant was not continued on active duty while being processed through the disability evaluation system. Furthermore, in accordance with Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-3202, Separation Documents, it states to only make authorized applicable entries on the DD Form 214. No other entries will be made unless specifically authorized by HQ AFPC/DPPRS. A complete copy of the ARPC/DPTS evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 6 July 2015 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2.  The application was timely filed. 3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. The applicant’s contention that he has only been paid for the days in which he reported and performed duties at his unit was noted; however, we do not find the evidence provided supports the applicant has been a victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2015-00132 in Executive Session on 20 August 2015 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: Chair Member Member The following documentary evidence pertaining AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2015-00132 was considered: Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 9 January 2015, w/atchs. Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C.  Letter, AFPC/DPTS, dated 1 June 2015, w/atchs. Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 July 2015. Exhibit E.  Record of Proceedings, dated 23 August 2011, w/Exhibits.