RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2015-00318 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The characterization of service on her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be changed from “Not Applicable” to honorable or general, under honorable conditions. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The current characterization of service “Not Applicable” is an incorrect characterization. The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 28 Dec 84, the applicant entered active duty in the Regular Air Force. On 8 Apr 85, the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) ruled she was unfit for the performance of active duty due to a physical condition which existed prior to military service. She acknowledged receipt agreeing with the findings and recommendation. On 11 Apr 85, she was advised that the Secretary of the Air Force made a determination of unfitness under AFR 35-4, Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement and Separation, and that she would be discharged effective 16 Apr 85. On 16 Apr 85, the applicant received an entry-level separation by reason of disability which existed prior to service, with a service characterized as “Not Applicable.” She was credited with 3 months and 19 days of active service. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPDPFDD recommends approval of the applicant’s request to change the character of service to honorable on her DD Form 214. Per AFR 35-4, Physical Evaluation for Retention, Retirement and Separation, chapter 4, paragraph 4-16c, dated 12 Sep 80, the applicant is warranted an honorable discharge. A review of the applicant’s disability case file indicates the Informal Physical Evaluation Board (IPEB) convened on 27 Mar 19085. The IPEB recommended Discharge with Severance Pay (DWSP) with a disability rating of 10%. The applicant concurred with the recommendation and was subsequently separated from the Air Force on 16 Apr 85. The governing regulation at the time of the applicant’s discharge states, “Except where otherwise shown below, each member discharged by reason of physical disability is honorably discharged and receives a DD Form 256 AF, Honorable Discharge.” The complete DPFDD evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 4 Aug 15 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant's complete submission in judging the merits of the case and agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicant's records be corrected as indicated below. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT be corrected to show that The DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, issued in conjunction with her April 16, 1985 release from active duty, be amended in Item 24, Character of Service, to reflect “Honorable” rather than “Not Applicable.” All members voted to correct the records as recommended. The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2015-00318 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 23 Jan 15. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPDPFD, dated 28 Jul 15. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 4 Aug 15.