RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2015-00384 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, block 11, “Primary Specialty,” be corrected to reflect “3S171” instead of “3S151.” APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Her military personnel records indicate she was upgraded to 3S171, effective 7 Jan 13. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to the applicant’s DD Form 214, on 15 Nov 05, she enlisted in the Regular Air Force. According to the applicant’s AF IMT 2096, Classification/On-The- Job Training Action, dated 7 Mar 13, her Primary Air Force Specialty Code (PAFSC) changed from 3S131 to 3S171, effective 7 Jan 13. On 28 May 14, the applicant was permanently retired for physical disability, effective 29 Jul 14. She was credited with 8 years, 8 months, and 14 days of total active service. Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, reflects her AFSCs as 3S131, Equal Opportunity, two years and nine months and 3P051, Security Forces, five years and nine months. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIC recommends denial indicating no evidence has been provided by the applicant or is available to support duty performance at the 7-skill level. The available evidence identifies two duty entries at the 3S131 skill level. This AFSC does not have a 5-skill level, so the upgrade was from the 3 to the 7-skill level. IAW AFI 36-3202, Separation Documents, Table 4, How to Prepare DD Form 214, Rule 14, states: “Enter the PAFSC and all additional AFSCs in which the member served for 1 year or more, during member's continuous active military service. In each AFSC, show the highest skill level in which the member performed duties.” While the applicant’s documentation supports award of the 7-skill level; absence duty performance at the 7-skill level it fails to meet the requirements for inclusion on the DD Form 214. The complete DPSIC evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 9 Jul 15 for review and comment within 30 days. As of this date, no response has been received by this office (Exhibit D). THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was timely filed. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2015-00384 in Executive Session on 1 Oct 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 15 Jan 15. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Letter, AFPC/DPSIC, dated 23 Mar 15, w/atchs. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 9 Jul 15.