RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS.


IN THE MATTER OF: 			DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2015-00508

						COUNSEL:  NONE

						HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He receive a DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge 
from Active Duty, for active duty service completed in 1991.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The Air National Guard unit he was attached to was activated 
under Title 10 and sent to Europe in support of the 1st Persian 
Gulf War in September 1991.  He completed the full term in which 
he was called to duty; however, he was never issued a DD Form 
214 when the term was concluded.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant initially entered the Air National Guard on 
23 Mar 87.

On 1 Oct 94, the applicant was furnished an honorable discharge 
from the Air National Guard and transferred to the Air Force 
Reserve, Obligated Reserve Section.
 
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.    


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

ARPC/DPTS recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or an injustice.  There are no documents identifying 
the applicant meets the criteria to receive a DD Form 214.  Per 
AFI 36-3202, Separation Documents, to receive a DD Form 214 a 
member must complete 90 consecutive or more active duty days or 
one day or more if in support of a contingency operation.  The 
applicant served from 12 Sep 91 to 29 Sep 91 and his orders do 
not place him in support of a contingency that qualifies to 
receive a DD Form 214.  Therefore, the applicant does not meet 
the qualifications to receive a DD Form 214.

A complete copy of the ARPC/DPTS evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 1 Apr 15 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  
Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find 
no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2015-00508 in Executive Session on 15 Sep 15, under 
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	


The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2015-00508 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 2 Feb 15, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, ARPC/DPTS, dated 24 Mar 15.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Apr 15.