RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS.


IN THE MATTER OF: 			DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2015-00637

						COUNSEL:  NONE

						HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of 
Transfer or Discharge, block 17c, “Date of Entry,” be corrected 
to reflect 2 May 67 instead of 9 Nov 67.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

Her DD Form 214 contains a typo and does not reflect the correct 
date of entry.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

According to the applicant’s DD Form 214, on 9 Nov 69, she 
entered the Regular Air Force.

According to the applicant’s DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 
214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or 
Discharge, dated 15 Jan 70, block 17c was corrected to reflect 
9 Nov 67 instead of 9 Nov 69. 

On 7 Nov 69, the applicant received an honorable discharge, and 
was credited with 1 year, 11 months, and 29 days of total active 
service.   

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.    


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSIPV recommends denial.  According to source documents in 
the applicant’s file, she entered extended active duty on 9 Nov 
67 not on 2 May 67.  The AF Form 133, Oath of Office, reflects 
that on 4 May 67, the applicant commissioned as an U.S. Air 
Force Reserve officer and according to her ARPC Form 75, 
Extended Active Duty Order, on 9 Nov 67, she entered extended 
active duty.  Her Statement of Service reflects 4 May 67; 
however, this date is reflected in the column which shows the 
effective dates of actions; or in her case, the date of 
acceptance of commission into the Air Force Reserves.  On the 
same line of this document, it reflects that on 9 Nov 67, she 
entered extended active duty.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIPV evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 7 Oct 15 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS OF THE BOARD:

After careful consideration of applicant’s request and the 
available evidence of record, we find the application untimely.  
The applicant did not file within three years after the alleged 
error or injustice was discovered as required by Title 10, 
United States Code, Section 1552 and Air Force Instruction 36-
2603.  The applicant has not shown a plausible reason for the 
delay in filing, and we are not persuaded that the record raises 
issues of error or injustice which require resolution on the 
merits.  Thus, we cannot conclude it would be in the interest of 
justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to file in a timely 
manner.  


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The application was not timely filed and it would not be in the 
interest of justice to waive the untimeliness.  It is the 
decision of the Board, therefore, to reject the application as 
untimely.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2015-00637 in Executive Session on 8 Dec 15 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

			, Panel Chair
			, Member
			, Member


The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2015-00637 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 22 Jan 15, w/atch.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIPV, dated 12 May 15.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 7 Oct 15.