RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2015-01372 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He receive a reenlistment bonus. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His AF IMT 1288, Application for Ready Reserve Assignment, was approved 26 Aug 14 prior to FY 2015, therefore, he was authorized a reenlistment bonus for his 3POX1 Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC). The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 23 Jan 07. On 26 Aug 14, the applicant’s AF IMT 1288, Application for Ready Reserve Assignment, was approved by the AETC IMA Program Manager. On 29 Sep 14, the applicant was furnished an honorable discharge, and was credited with seven years, eight months, and seven days of active service. On 25 Nov 14, the applicant signed AF DD Form 4/1, Enlistment/Reenlistment Document Armed Forces of the United States, enlisting in the Air Force Reserve for four years. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: ARPC/DPAA recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. After review of the applicant’s military personnel records they determined that he was not eligible for the reenlistment bonus. He enlisted into the Air Force Reserve from Regular Air Force on 25 Nov 14 with AFSC 3P0X1. The fiscal year 2015 critical skills list had an effective date of 31 Oct 14 with an end date of 30 Sep 15. His AFSC of 3P0X1 was not listed on the fiscal year 2015 critical skills list. If the applicant would have enlisted on 30 Sep 14 or before, he would have been eligible for the 3P0X1 bonus which was listed on the fiscal year 2014 critical skills list. A complete copy of the ARPC/DPAA evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 11 Aug 15 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2.  The application was timely filed. 3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2015-01372 in Executive Session on 4 Nov 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2015-01372 was considered: Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, received 1 Apr 15, w/atchs. Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C.  Memorandum, ARPC/DPAA, dated 16 Jul 15. Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 11 Aug 15.