RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS. IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2015-01484 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, be corrected to reflect his service at Seymour Johnson AFB, NC. By amendment at Exhibit E, he request block 25A Specialty Number and Title on his DD Form 214 be amended to add Air Force Specialty Code (AFSC) 43151E and block 28 be amended to read Seymour Johnson AFB. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: His service at Seymour Johnson AFB was not on his DD Form 214. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: According to the applicant’s DD Form 214, he entered the Regular Air Force on 15 Sep 61. He was honorably released from active duty on 14 Sep 65 and transferred to the Air Force Reserve. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. A review of the applicant’s records indicates the DD Form 214 was accurately prepared. He has not provided any supporting documentation to substantiate that his DD Form 214 was published contrary to governing directives or policy. Per governing DoD and USAF directives and policy, the unit of assignment at the time of separation from active service is listed on the DD Form 214. The applicant’s last unit of assignment was 1613 Organizational Maintenance Squadron (1613 OMS), McGuire AFB, NJ as is accurately reflected on his DD Form 214. There is no authority that existed then or now to list chronological assignment locations on a DD Form 214. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: In support of his request, the applicant provides a personal statement and copies of two special orders showing he was assigned to Seymour Johnson AFB. In his personal statement the applicant indicates that block 25a of his DD Form 214, should read 43151E and 43151F and block 28 should read Seymour Johnson AFB. The applicant’s complete response, with attachments, is at Exhibit E. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed. While the applicant claims a date of discovery of less than three years ago, in our view, the reasonable date of discovery of the alleged error or injustice was more than three years ago and the application is therefore untimely. However, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3. Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission, to include his rebuttal response, in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. According to DOD and Air Force policy, units of assignment are not chronologically listed on the DD Form 214, only the last unit of assignment is listed. Block 28 on the DD Form 214 correctly lists the location of the technical training school the applicant attended. There was no evidence the applicant’s DD Form 214 was not prepared in accordance with the governing directives or policy. Regarding the portion of the applicant’s request to add the AFSC 43151E to his DD Form 214, we note the AFSC on his DD Form 214 is his primary AFSC and the one in question is in the same career field. Therefore, in the absence of relevant evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2015-01484 in Executive Session on 10 Dec 15, under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: , Panel Chair , Member , Member The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2015-01484 was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 4 Feb 15, w/atchs. Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C. Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR, undated. Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 24 Jul 15. Exhibit E. Letter, Applicant, dated 15 Aug 15, w/atchs.