RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS. IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2015-01947 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: 1.  He receive back pay and allowances, to include Per Diem, Hazardous Duty Pay, and Flight Pay, for time served in Vietnam. 2.  His DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty, be corrected to reflect he drove military vehicles to include large troop caring vehicles and tow/wreckers. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: He did not receive the correct military pay during his time in Vietnam. Before he deployed, he was informed by a sergeant to discontinue his military pay which he did. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 28 Dec 66. On 14 Dec 70, the applicant was furnished an honorable discharge, and was credited with three years, eleven months, and seventeen days of active service, to include two years, two months, and twenty-one days of foreign service. On 2 Oct 73, the applicant was issued a DD Form 215, Correction to DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, adding the Vietnam Service Medal (VSM) to item #24 of his DD Form 214. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memoranda prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and Defense Finance and Accounting Services (DFAS), which are attached at Exhibits C and D. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice warranting changing the applicant’s DD Form 214 to reflect he drove military vehicles to include large troop caring vehicles and tow/wreckers. DoDI 1336.01, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty (DD Form 214/5 Series), AFI 36-3202, Separation Documents, or AF policy do not authorize the listing of vehicles driven while having served in the military be recorded on a DD Form 214. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C. DFAS-IN recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice warranting that he receive back pay and allowances, to include Per Diem, Hazardous Duty Pay, and Flight Pay, for time served in Vietnam. As this case dates back more than 45 years they had no documentation in their files to substantiate his claim of nonpayment of entitlements based on the adjustment of effective date of promotion. Should the applicant produce the leave and earnings statements from the time frame requested, their office would revisit the possibility of back pay and allowances. A complete copy of the DFAS-IN evaluation is at Exhibit D. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Copies of the Air Force evaluations were forwarded to the applicant on 1 Oct 15, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit E). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2. The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file. 3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinions and recommendations of the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR) and DFAS-IN, and adopt their rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice. Of note is DFAS-IN’s offer to revisit the possibility of back pay and allowances should the applicant produce leave and earnings statements from the time frame requested. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2015-01947 in Executive Session on 10 Dec 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2015-01947 was considered: Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 7 May 15. Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR, received 21 Jul 15 Exhibit D.  Memorandum, DFAS-IN, received 22 Jul 15. Exhibit E.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Oct 15.