RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2015-01955 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The College Loan Repayment Program (CLRP) contract he signed upon his initial enlistment be honored by allowing him to now participate in the program. APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: The CLRP administrative process in 2004 was awful, with limited information available on how to complete required paperwork. The driving incentive for his enlistment was using the CLRP to ease his financial burden, and his CLRP contract signed in 2004 has not been upheld. The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A. STATEMENT OF FACTS: On 14 Jun 04, the applicant signed the AF Form 3008, Supplement to Enlistment Agreement – United States Air Force, item E. Remarks, College Loan Repayment Program (CLRP) acknowledging that: repayment will be made only after each successful year of active duty (over a 3-year period) that he performs commencing on the date of his enlistment in the Air Force. The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 15 Jun 04. On 25 Apr 08, the applicant reenlisted for four years and one month. On 14 Nov 12, the applicant reenlisted for four years. The applicant is currently serving in the Regular Air Force in the grade of staff sergeant (E-5). Pursuant to Title 10 USC § 2171, the CLRP is offered only at enlistment to first term airmen and must be used within the first term of service. The program is time sensitive and upon entering a second term of enlistment, participation into the program is negated under current Air Force policy. The Air Force repays the lesser amount of one-third of $3,333.33, per year of outstanding qualifying student loans. Payments are made in three annual installments and the maximum amount is $10,000.00 less federal income tax. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSIT recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. The CLRP is valid during a member’s initial enlistment. The applicant enlisted in the Air Force on 15 Jun 04, and has completed at least two terms of service. A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSIT evaluation is at Exhibit C. APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 1 Oct 15 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D). As of this date, no response has been received by this office. THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT: 1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations. 2.  The application was timely filed. 3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice. After a careful review of the applicant's contentions, documentation submitted in support of the request, and the available evidence of record, we are not convinced the applicant has provided sufficient evidence for us to conclude that he is the victim of an error or injustice. Specifically, we note that on 14 Jun 04, one day prior to beginning his first enlisted active duty (EAD), the applicant signed AF Form 3008, Supplement to Enlistment Agreement – United States Air Force, constituting that he understood and accepted the enlistment agreement, specifically, item E, Remarks, College Loan Repayment Program (CLRP): repayment will be made only after each successful year of active duty (over a 3-year period) that he performs commencing on the date of his enlistment in the Air Force. The applicant has provided no documentation supporting that he submitted any loan repayment requests prior to beginning his second enlistment commencing on 25 Apr 08. Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief. THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT: The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application. The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2015-01955 in Executive Session on 10 Dec 15 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603: The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2015-01955 was considered: Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 6 May 15, w/atchs. Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records. Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSIT, dated 3 Aug 15. Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 1 Oct 15.