RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 				DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2015-02073

  						COUNSEL:  NONE

						HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty, block 8b, Station Where Separated, be changed from Texas 
to Alaska.


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She out-processed and separated from Alaska, after her last duty 
assignment but her DD Form 214 has her prior duty assignment 
listed.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

On 8 Jul 10, the applicant entered the Regular Air Force.

On 1 Sep 14, the applicant was separated after completing her 
first full term of service and transferred to the Air Force 
Reserve.  She was credited with 4 years, 1 month, and 25 days of 
active service.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.    


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of 
an error or injustice.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 was prepared 
in accordance with governing directives, and without error.  
AFI 36-3202, Separation Documents, states [regarding block 8b.] 
“Location of facility where separation document was prepared or, 
if coming from an overseas location, it will be the base where 
the document was authenticated.”  The applicant’s separation 
documents were prepared and authenticated at JBSA Randolph AFB 
TX.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 27 Aug 15 for review and comment within 30 days 
(Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by 
this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force OPR and adopt its rationale as 
the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the 
victim of an error of injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of 
evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting 
the requested relief.  


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2015-02073 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 12 May 15, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 8 Jul 15.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 27 Aug 15.