RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS


IN THE MATTER OF: 			DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2015-02382

 					COUNSEL:  NONE

					HEARING DESIRED:  NO 



APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Her DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active 
Duty, be corrected as follows:

	Block 8b Station where separated
	Block 19a Mailing address after separation 
	Block 20, Member requests copy 6 Be Sent to:  Office of 
	          Veterans Affairs (ADMINISTRATIVELY CORRECTED) 


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

She was separated from Fairchild Air Force Base.  Her address, 
as listed, is not current and she requests a copy of her DD Form 
214 be sent to the Idaho Office of the Veteran’s Affairs. 

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachment, is at 
Exhibit A.


STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is a former member of the Air Force.  She was 
discharged on 31 May 2015, in the rank of senior airman.

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are 
contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of 
primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.    


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial.  AFI 36-3202, Separation 
Documents, table 4, rule 11, states the location of facility 
where the separation documents are prepared will be listed in 
block 8b of the DD Form 214.  The sole purpose of the address 
listed in block 19a is for initial delivery of the DD Form 214.  
With the applicant in receipt of the document, the data is now 
administrative and has no impact on veteran benefits.  The 
applicant’s DD Form 214 is available to all state Veteran 
Affairs offices regardless of the state annotated in block 20.

As an administrative remedy, a copy of the DD Form 214 has been 
mailed to the Idaho Veteran Affairs office.

The applicant has not submitted documentation substantiating 
that her DD Form 214 was published contrary to governing 
regulations.  

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the 
applicant on 15 September 2015 for review and comment within 
30 days (Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been 
received by this office.


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took 
notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the 
merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and 
recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility 
(OPR) and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion 
and find the applicant has not been the victim of an error of 
injustice.  Therefore, other than what has been administratively 
remedied, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no 
basis to recommend granting the requested relief.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2015-02382 in Executive Session on 11 February 2016 
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2015-02382 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 6 Jun 15, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 9 Jul 15.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 15 Sep 15.