RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF: 			DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2015-02508

						COUNSEL:  NONE

						HEARING DESIRED:  NONE INDICATED 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214 be corrected to reflect his current address.  

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

He moved after his initial DD Form 214 was filled out.  

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant initially entered the Regular Air Force on 9 August 2011.  

On 4 June 2015, an AF IMT 100, Request and Authorization for Separation, was issued for the applicant’s release from active duty, effective 8 August 2015.  

On 1 July 2015, the applicant initiated an AF Form 1411, Extension or Cancellation of Extension of Enlistment in the Regular Air Force (REGAF)/Air Force Reserve (AF Reserve)/Air National Guard (ANG), for an extension of his current enlistment for 12 months.  

On 7 July 2015, the applicant’s request for extension was approved for his 8 August 2015 date of separation (DOS) to be extended until 8 August 2016.  

In accordance with Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-3202, Separation Documents, separation occurs when members of the Air Force leave active duty, move from one active duty status to another, or are discharged, retired, transferred, dismissed, or released.  

A review of the Automated Records Management System revealed no record of a DD Form 214being issued to the applicant.  

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.  
AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial.  In accordance with Air Force Instruction 36-3202, Separation Documents, the sole purpose of the address listed is for the initial physical delivery of the DD Form 214.  The data is administrative and has no impact on veteran benefits or entitlements.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPDOR evaluation is at Exhibit C.

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 23 November 2015 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by this office.

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case and agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office or primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant is not the victim of either an error or injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.

4.  The applicant’s case is adequately documented and it has not been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel will materially add to our understanding of the issues involved.  Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably considered.

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2015-02508 in Executive Session on 5 April 2016 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
	Panel Chair
	Member
	Member

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2015-02508 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 11 June 2015.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 4 November 2015.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 23 November 2015.