RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF: 			DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2016-01232

						COUNSEL:  NONE

						HEARING DESIRED:  NO 

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

His DD Form 214, Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge, issued 15 Feb 11, be corrected to reflect 280 Wk-Dy or 285 Cal-Dy Title 10/active duty days under Special Orders R-6000063, R-6000074, R-6000324, R-6000086, A-Z000010.  

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

The total active duty time served associated with the Special Orders mentioned above is not accounted for on his DD Form 214.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

During the matter in question, the applicant was serving in the Puerto Rico Air National Guard, in the grade of Senior Airman (E-4).

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C.    

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

NGB/A1P recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice.  The applicant states that his total active duty time was not accounted for, when in fact it was, not only by the orders but within Point Credit Accounting and Reporting System (PCARS).  In accordance with (IAW) DoDI 1336.01 “Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty,” 20 Aug 09, Incorporating Change 1, Effective 29 Dec 14, states in Enclosure 3, a DD Form 214 will be issued when the member has served for 90 days or more. None of the orders submitted by the applicant are continuous, and do not accumulate to over 90 days. 

A complete copy of the NGB/A1P evaluation is at Exhibit C.

APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 13 Dec 16 for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by this office.

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error of injustice.  Therefore, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2016-01232 in Executive Session on 25 Jul 17 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2016-01232 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 21 Mar 16, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, NGB/A1P, dated 6 Jul 16.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 13 Dec 16.

Pursuant to paragraph 1 of AFI 36-2603 (Title 32 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 865.1), it is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board's proceedings in the above entitled matter.