RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS

IN THE MATTER OF:	DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2016-03903

XXXXXXXXX	COUNSEL: NONE	

 	HEARING: NO	

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

1.  His AF Form 77, Letter of Evaluation, dated 6 Jan 13 thru 6 Mar 14, be removed from his record.  

2.  His Duty Air Force Specialty Code (DAFSC) 11M1F, KC-135 Pilot, 63rd Aerial Refueling Squadron, MacDill AFB, FL, dated 7 Mar 14 be removed from his record.

3.  His DAFSC, 11M1F, KC-135 Pilot, Buckley AFB, CO, dated 29 Sep 14, be removed from his record.

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

His AF Form 77, dated 6 Jan 13 thru 6 Mar 14, is incorrect because it overlaps with his last active duty Officer Performance Report (OPR), which covers the period of 6 Jan 13 thru 30 Jun 13.  He separated from active duty on 30 Jun 13 and remained in the Individual Ready Reserve (IRR) until 17 Jan 16.  Once the AF Form 77 is removed from his record, he will submit a new AF Form 77 that covers the period of 1 Jul 13 thru 17 Jan 16.

DAFSC of 11M1F for MacDill AFB is incorrect because he was hired by the unit, but never gained by the unit.  

DAFSC of 11M1F for Buckley AFB is incorrect because he never reported to the squadron, never went thru KC-135 training, and never held the AFSC.

The applicant’s complete submission is at Exhibit A.

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant is an Air Force Reserve Individual Mobilization Augmentee (IMA) Major.  

His Reserve Order, DA-0061dated 25 Mar 14, reflects his assignment to the Non-obligated Non-participating Ready Reserve in AFSC 11M3F.   

Reserve Order DA-00687 dated 7 Jan 16, reflects his assignment to AFELMUSCENTCOM, MacDill AFB is in AFSC 11F4Y.  

For more information, see the excerpt of the applicant’s record at Exhibit B and the advisory at Exhibit C.

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFRC/A1K recommends denying the application.  The applicant should have first applied to the ERAB to correct the AF Form 77.  Corrections to duty history should have been submitted in the virtual Personnel Center (vPC).  The complete advisory is at Exhibit C.

APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The Board sent a copy of the Air Force evaluation to the applicant on 5 Mar 18 for comment (Exhibit E), but has received no response.

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The application was not timely filed.

2.  The applicant did not exhaust all available avenues of non-judicial relief before applying to the Board.  The Board does not consider applications without documentation showing exhaustion of such avenues of relief.

3.  After thoroughly reviewing all Exhibits, it is the Board’s opinion that the applicant is not the victim of an error or injustice.  The Board concurs with the rationale and recommendation of AFRC/A1K and finds that a preponderance of the evidence does not substantiate the applicant’s contentions.  Therefore, the Board recommends against correcting the applicant’s records.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:

The applicant be informed all available avenues of administrative relief have not been exhausted, and the application will only be reconsidered upon receipt of documentary evidence indicating that such avenues of administrative relief have been exhausted.

CERTIFICATION:

The following quorum of the Board, as defined in Air Force Instruction (AFI) 36-2603, Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records (AFBCMR), paragraph 1.5, considered Docket Number BC-2016-03903 in Executive Session on 10 Jul 18:

Panel Chair 
Panel Member
Panel Member

All members voted not to correct the record.  The panel considered the following:

Exhibit A:	Application, DD Form 149, w/atchs, dated 21 Sep 16.
Exhibit B:	Documentary evidence, including relevant excerpts from official records.
Exhibit C:	Advisory opinion, AFRC/A1K, dated 1 Mar 18.
Exhibit D:	Letter, FTE Advisory, AFBCMR to applicant, dated 5 Mar 18.
Exhibit E:	Notification of Advisory, SAF/MRBC to applicant, dated 5 Mar 18.

Taken together with all Exhibits, this document constitutes the true and complete Record of Proceedings required by AFI 36-2603, paragraph 4.11.9.