RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF: 			DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2017-00182

						COUNSEL:  NONE

HEARING DESIRED:  NO

APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

Block 8b. Station Where Separated, on the DD Form 214, Certificate of Release or Discharge From Active Duty, be corrected to reflect Hurlburt Field, FL, rather than Joint Base San Antonio (JBSA) Randolph, TX.

APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

At the time of her separation she was stationed at Hurlburt Field, FL.

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at Exhibit A.

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

AF IMT 100, Request and Authorization for Separation, dated 29 Aug 16, Item 16. Relieved From Assignment (Unit, Major Command, Address and Servicing MPF) lists the assignment location as Hurlburt Field, FL.

On 27 Dec 16, the applicant was honorably discharged, and was credited with six years active service.

Item 8b on her DD Form 214 reflects the station where separated as JBSA, Randolph, TX.   

The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the memorandum prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility (OPR), which is attached at Exhibit C.  

AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSOR recommends denial, indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. 

AFI 36-3202, Separation Documents, states the location of the facility where the separation documents were prepared will be listed in Item 8b on the DD Form 214.  The applicant’s separation documents were prepared at JBSA Randolph TX, by the Air Force Personnel Center’s Total Force Service Center (TFSC).  

The data on the DD Form 214 is accurate and in accordance with governing directive.

A complete copy of the AFPC/DPSOR evaluation is at Exhibit C.

APPLICANT’S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant on 10 Oct 17, for review and comment within 30 days (Exhibit D).  As of this date, no response has been received by this office.

THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was timely filed.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  We took notice of the applicant’s complete submission in judging the merits of the case; however, we agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force OPR and adopt its rationale as the basis for our conclusion the applicant has not been the victim of an error or injustice.  Therefore, we find no basis to recommend granting the requested relief.

THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.

The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2017-00182 in Executive Session on 13 Mar 18 under the provisions of AFI 36-2603, Air Force Board for Correction of Military Records:

	, Panel Chair
	, Member
	, Member

The following documentary evidence pertaining to AFBCMR Docket Number BC-2017-00182 was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 30 Dec 16, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Excerpts from Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSOR, dated 28 Sep 17.
	Exhibit D.  Letter, AFBCMR, dated 10 Oct 17.

Pursuant to paragraph 1 of AFI 36-2603 (Title 32 Code of Federal Regulations, Part 865.1), it is certified that a quorum was present at the Board's review and deliberations, and that the foregoing is a true and complete record of the Board’s proceedings.