AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD
GRADE	AFSN/SSAN

YES	N't
x

PERSONAL  APPEARANCE

x	RECORD  REVIEW
ADDRESS AND OR ORGANllATION OFCOUNSEL

VOTE OF'lHE BOARD

MEMBER SITTING

HON	GEN	UOTHC

OTHER

DENY

X*+ X*+ X*+
X*+

A66.00

E:iclllBITS SUBl\fi
ORDER APPOI NTING THE BOARD
2  APPLICATION FOR REV IEW OF DISCHARGE
3  LErfER OF NO'llHC'ATION
4  BHll:F 0 PERSONNEL FILE
COUNSEL'S RELEASE TO THE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE

X*+

TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING

HEARING DAl'E

27 Mar 2014

CAS6 NUMBER

FD-2013-00819

·sISSUE Alll>THE 00	·sD£CISIQNALRATl(»,(ALI! AREDISCUSSEl>OflnlE  ATTln:t>AfR fOJ.ct D
""'
Case heard  i n  Washington,  D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.

Names and votes will be made available to the applicant at the applicant's request.

*Narrative reason and Authority
+RE Code

TO:
SAF MRBR
550 C STREET WEST,SUITE 40
RANDOLPH AFD,TX 78150-4742

I ..     • t

II
FROM:

SECRt;TA R\ OFTll[AIR FORCE PERSOl\NEL COUNCIL A I R t'()R('r. OISOIARGE REl IEW IOARD
IS. 5 COMllA!'lll OR.u:WING ,JRO FU)()R
ANDREWS M'8, MD 2070-7001

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00	(EF-V2)	Previous

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE	CASE NUMBER

FD-2013-00819	

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for  upgrade of discharge to honorable, to change the  reason  and authority for the discharge, and to change the reenlistment code.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The request for the upgrade of the discharge, to change the reason and authority for discharge, and to change the reenlistment code is denied.

ISSUE:  Applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct - Drug Abuse

Applicant contends discharge was inequitable because it was based on a one time incident. The record indicated she received an Article 15 for use of marijuana. The record shows that the applicant positive during a random urinalysis. The applicant admitted to the use.  After review of the record, the Board found no evidence to indicate that the applicant did not know right from wrong or that in her five years and 10 months of service was unaware of the Air Force policy of zero tolerance to drug use. The Board found the negative aspects of the willful misconduct outweighed the positive  aspects of the applicant's performance and concluded that the discharge was appropriate.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation and was within the discretion of the discharge authority and the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief