AIR FORCE DISCHARG E REVIEW BOARD HEARING  RECORD
NAM E Of SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE L'llTIAL)	CIV\DE
{b) (6)
TYPE  GE	I	PERSONA L APPEARANCE	x	I	RECORD REV IEW
COU!'IStL	NAME or COUNSEL A. 0 OR ORCANIUTION	ADDRESS AJ\l> OR ORCA.NIZATION or COUSSEL
YES	No
x
VOTE OFTHE BOARD
M EM BER SITf lNG	HON	GEN	UOTHC	OTHER	DENY
(b) (6)	x
-
I	x
x x x
ISSU£S	A94.53	L OEX NU\tOER	A67.10	£XRIBITS SUBMITfED TO THE BOARD
I ORDER APPOINTING TliE BOARD
2	APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE
3	LETTER OF NOTIFICATION
4    BR£EF OF PERSONNEL FILE COUNSEL"S  RELEASE TO Tl IE BOARD
ADDITIONAL  tx!-llBlTS SUUMI I  rEO AT TIME Of PERSONAL APPEARANCE
TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE 1IEAR ING

11£ARINC DA.TE	CA.SE NLMOER

03 Jun 2015	FD-2014-00574
Al'PUCA.'JT"S ISSut A. 'l> THE BOARD S OECISIO"AL RATIO"Al..ll AREOISC\JSSED ON TilE ATTACHED AIR l'OR.CE OISC'HAP.0£ RElllE'" 90/JlO OECISIO"Al. RATI0"AL6

Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise appl icant of the decision of the Board. the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an appl ication to the AFBCMR.

{b) (6)	-

lNOORSEMENT	DATE: 611712015	-
TO:	FROM:
SAF/MROR	SECRETARY or THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL

550 C STREET WEST.SUITE 40

AIR FORCE DISCHARCE REV![\\' SOARD
1g5COM.\IANO DR. EE WINC. lRD FLOOR

RANDOLPH   AFB,  TX  7&150-4n2	A',IOREWS AFB.MO 2076l-7001

AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JA 00	(EF-V2)	Previous

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE	CASE NUMBER

FD-2014-00574	

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable.

The applicant was offered  a personal  appearance before the Discharge  Review Board  (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING:  The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge.

ISSUE: The applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct - Minor Disciplinary Infractions

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an applicant's discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption , to  include evidence submitted by the applicant.  The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety . In order to adhere to Mental Health Amendments to 10 USC 1553, a physician with specialized training on mental health disorders was present for this board . The applicant's record of service included one Article 15, three Letters of Reprimand , one Letter of Admonishment, and two Letters of Counseling. His misconduct included  failure to pay Government  Travel Card (3x), dorm room inspection failure (3x), underage consumption, and with intent to deceive made false official statement to a SNCO.

The applicant submitted no issues regarding the inequity or impropriety of his discharge. The applicant does submit that since being discharged he has been employed and has had no legal issues. The DRB was pleased to see that the applicant has made some positive strides in his life since being discharged. However, no inequity or impropriety in his discharge was suggested or found in the course of the hearing.  The Board opined that through the administrative actions taken, the applicant had ample opportunities to change his negative behavior. They found the seriousness of the willful misconduct offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty performance. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence to warrant an upgrade of the discharge.

A discharge is upgraded only if the applicant and the Board can establish that an inequity or impropriety took place at the time of discharge.  After a thorough review of the record, the Board found no evidence to justify an upgrade of the discharge characterization .

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation, was within the discretion of the discharge authority, and that the applicant was provided full administrative due process.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and determines the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief