AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARINC RECORD
NAME OF' SEilV iCE M£Ml £1t (LAST, F-IRST MlDOLEINITIA L)	CRAOE	AFSN/SSAN
(b) (6)	(b) (6)

TYPE   GEN	x	I	PERSONAL  APPEARANCE	I	RECORD  REVIEW
COUN.S I..	NA\'1E OFCOUNSEi.. ANOOR ORGAN 17..ATION	AOORl:SSANO OR ORGANll \TION or COIJl\SEL
YES	No
x

(b) (6)

VOTE OF THE BOARD
MEMBER SITTING	HON	GEN	UOTHC	OTllER	DENY
X* X* X*
X*
X*

ISSUES

A94.01

INDEX NUl\ IO Cll

A67.90

EXllTBITS SlJBi\llTIED TO TllE BOAIW
1 ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD
2 APl'LICATION fOR REV IEW OF DISCHARGE:
3 LE'n'ER OF NUTIFICA flON
4  13RIEF OF l'ERSONNl::L FlLP. COUNSEL'S RELl::ASE TO 1llE BOARD
ADDITIONAL EXIllBITS SUBMIHEDAT TIJ\IE OF
PERSONAL APPEARANCE
Tf\l'E RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING

llf.A Rl:-!G DATE	CASI: NU lllf.R

12 Mar 2015	FD-2014-00665
APnlCANf'S L sur AND Tl IE DO...RD'S DECISIONAL R.ATIONAl.E ARE OISCUSSCJ) ON TllE A ITA(ll£0 AIR FORCE OISCllARGG REVIEW 001\RD OCCISIONAL RATIO,ALC.

Case heard in Wash ington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, and l he right to submit an appl ication to the A FBCMR.

*Narrative

(b) (6)

INDORSEMENT		DATE:   3/16/20 15	
TO:	
SAF/!llRDR
550 (' STREEr WEST. SUITE 40
RANDOi.Pi! AFB, TX 78150-4742	FR0'1:	
SECRETARY OFTit E Al R l'ORtE PERSONNEi..('OUNCI I.
A IR FORCE DISOIARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 CO'.\llANO OR. tE \\'INC..lRll .. LOOR
ANOREIVS AFB, MD 29762 7001	
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00	(EF-V2)	Previous

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE	CASE NUMBER

FD-2014-00665	

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for upgrade of discharge to Honorable and to change the reason and authority for the discharge.

The applicant appeared and testified before the Discharge Review Board (ORB), without counsel, at Andrews AFB on March 12, 2015

The following additional exhibits were submitted at the hearing: Exhibit #5: Applicant's additional medical documents

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: The Board denies the upgrade of the discharge and change of reason and  authority  for discharge.

ISSUE: The applicant received a General discharge for Misconduct - Conduct Prejudicial to Good Order and Discipline.

The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an Applicant 's discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption , to include evidence submitted by the applicant. The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to ensure the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety. In order to adhere to Mental Health Amendments to 10 USC 1553, a physician with specialized trai ning on mental heal th disorders was present for this board. The Applicant 's record of service included five Letters of Reprimand, one Letter of Counseling, and five Records of Individual Counseling. Her miscond uct included unprofessiona l and disrespectful language towards a SNCO; insubord inate attitude towards a SNCO; failure to return to duty after duty after an appointment; failure to obey a direct order (2x); failure to meet standard for a fitness assessment (2x); failure to be on time for drill (2x); m isuse of Air Force communications; unauthorized absence from duty; and failure to attend a scheduled appointment.

The applicant contends that the discharge was i nequ itable because i t was too harsh; however the Board finds that the applicant did not present or submit any issues contesting the equity or propriety of the discharge. The Board opined that through the administrative actions taken, the applicant had ample opportunities to change her negative behav ior. They found the seriousness of the willfu l misconduct offset any positive aspects of the applicant's duty perfonnance. A discharge is upgraded only if the applicant and the Board can establish that an inequity or impropriety took place at the time of discharge. The Board reviewed the entire record and found no evidence of impropriety or inequity to warrant an upgrade of the discharge.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the  discharge was consistent with the procedural and substantive requirements of the discharge regulation, was withi n the discretion of the discharge authority, and that the applicant was prov ided full administrative due process.
In view of the foregoing findings, the Board further concludes that there exists no legal or equitable basis for upgrade of discharge and dete1mi nes the discharge should remain unchanged.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief