AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD HEARING RECORD	
NAME OF SERVICE MEMBER (LAST, FIRST MIDDLE INITIAL)
(b) (6)	HEARING DATE
2017-07-13	CASE NUMBER
FD-2016-00504	
TYPE
Honorable		PERSONAL APPEARANCE	X	NON-PERSONAL APPEARANCE	
COUNSEL	NAME OF COUNSEL AND OR ORGANIZATION
(b) (6)	ADDRESS AND OR ORGANIZATION OF COUNSEL
(b) (6)	
Yes	No			
X				
MEMBER SITTING	VOTE OF THE BOARD	
	HON	GEN	UOTHC	OTHER	DENY	
(b) (6)	X*#					
(b) (6)	X*#					
(b) (6)	X*#					
(b) (6)	X*#					
(b) (6)	X*#					
						
ISSUES	INDEX NUMBER	EXHIBITS SUBMITTED TO THE BOARD	
		1	ORDER APPOINTING THE BOARD	
		2	APPLICATION FOR REVIEW OF DISCHARGE	
		3	LETTER OF NOTIFICATION	
		4	BRIEF OF PERSONNEL FILE	
			COUNSEL’S RELEASE TO THE BOARD	
			ADDITIONAL EXHIBITS SUBMITTED AT TIME OF   PERSONAL APPEARANCE	
			TAPE RECORDING OF PERSONAL APPEARANCE HEARING	
APPLICANT’S ISSUE AND THE BOARD’S DECISIONAL RATIONALE ARE DISCUSSED ON THE ATTACHED AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE.	
Case heard in Washington, D.C.

Advise applicant of the decision of the Board, the right to a personal appearance with/without counsel, and the right to submit an application to the AFBCMR.

* - Narrative Reason
#- Reentry Code	(b) (6)

SIGNATURE OF BOARD PRESIDENT	DATE: 8/30/2017	
TO:
SAF/MRBR
550 C STREET WEST, SUITE 40 RANDOLPH AFB, TX 78150-4742	FROM:
SECRETARY OF THE AIR FORCE PERSONNEL COUNCIL AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD
1535 COMMAND DR, EE WING, 3RD FLOOR ANDREWS AFB, MD 20762-7001	
AFHQ FORM 0-2077, JAN 00	(EF-V2)	Previous edition will be used

AIR FORCE DISCHARGE REVIEW BOARD DECISIONAL RATIONALE	CASE NUMBER

FD-2016-00504	

GENERAL: The applicant appeals for a change to the narrative reason, and reentry code.

The applicant was offered a personal appearance before the Discharge Review Board (DRB) but declined and requests that the review be completed based on the available service record.

The attached brief contains available pertinent data on the applicant and the factors leading to the discharge.

FINDING: After a review of the record, the Board unanimously voted to grant the relief of the requested upgrade as discussed below.

DISCUSSION: The Air Force Discharge Review Board, under its responsibility to examine the propriety and equity of an applicant’s discharge, is authorized to change the characterization of service and the reason for discharge if such change is warranted. In reviewing discharges, the Board presumes regularity in the conduct of governmental affairs unless there is substantial credible evidence to rebut the presumption, to include evidence submitted by the applicant.

The Board completed a thorough review of the circumstances that led to the discharge and the discharge process to determine if the discharge met the pertinent standards of equity and propriety.

The applicant received an Honorable discharge Homosexual Admission Separation Code (HRB) and reentry code 2C. The Board recognized the Repeal of “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” policy and resulting impropriety of the original discharge, necessitating a change to the narrative reason as well as the reentry code.

After a thorough review of the record, the Board found evidence to justify a change to the reason for the discharge, and the reenlistment code.

CONCLUSION: The Discharge Review Board concludes that the discharge was consistent with the procedural and polices in place at the time, however polices have changed, and the Discharge Review Board will provide relief based on the propriety standard.

In view of the foregoing findings, the Board concludes that the overall quality of applicant’s service is more accurately reflected by the reason for the discharge is more accurately described as Secretarial Authority and the reenlistment code changed to 3K under the provisions of 10 USC §1553.

Attachment: Examiner's Brief