MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION

	IN THE CASE OF:    

	BOARD DATE:        14 January 1999          
	DOCKET NUMBER:   AR1999015418

	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.  

	Mr. Loren G. Harrell		Director	
	Ms. Deborah L. Brantley		Analyst	

  The following members, a quorum, were present:

	Mr. Raymond V. O'Connor, Jr.		Chairperson	
	Ms. Shirley L. Powell		Member	
	Ms. Kathleen A. Newman		Member	

	The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date.  In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether the application was filed within the time established by statute, and if not, whether it would be in the interest of justice to waive the failure to timely file.

	The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records
	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
	            advisory opinion, if any)

APPLICANT REQUESTS:  Award of the Good Conduct Medal.  He states that he was denied the award by his commander after receiving a summary court-martial for 5 days of AWOL.  He notes that he is now 73 years old and would like to “leave this earth with a clean conscious and military record.”

PURPOSE:  To determine whether the application was submitted within the time limit established by law, and if not, whether it is in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records were apparently lost or destroyed during the 1973 fire at the National Personnel Records Center.  Information contained herein was reconstructed from alternative sources, including documents provided by the applicant.

The applicant was inducted and entered active duty on 14 September 1943.  His separation document confirms that he had 6 days of lost time, although there is no indication of the circumstances nor dates of his AWOL period.

The applicant served overseas between October 1945 and February 1946.  He was honorably discharged from active duty on 5 March 1946 as a result of demobilization.

Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who distinguish themselves by their conduct, efficiency and fidelity during a qualifying period of active duty enlisted service.  This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service.  While any record of non-judicial punishment could be in conflict with recognizing the soldier’s service as exemplary, such record should not be viewed as automatically disqualifying.  However, conviction by court-martial terminates a period of qualifying service.  The fact that the applicant’s total military service was less than three years precluded him from completing a qualifying period of service for award of the Good Conduct Medal, following termination of his initial period, based on the court-martial conviction.

Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice.  Failure to file within 3 years may be excused by a correction board if it finds it would be in the interest of justice to do so.

DISCUSSION:  The alleged error or injustice was, or with reasonable diligence should have been discovered on 5 March 1946, the date of his discharge.  However, in view of the fact that the Board was not established until 2 January 1947 the applicant’s 3 year period in which to file an application for correction of military records expired on 2 January 1950; 3 years from the date the Board was established.

The application is dated 25 December 1997 and the applicant has not explained or otherwise satisfactorily demonstrated by competent evidence that it would be in the interest of justice to excuse the failure to apply within the time allotted.

DETERMINATION:  The subject application was not submitted within the time required.  The applicant has not presented and the records do not contain sufficient justification to conclude that it would be in the interest of justice to grant the relief requested or to excuse the failure to file within the time prescribed by law.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  EXCUSE FAILURE TO TIMELY FILE

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___rvo__  ___slp__  ___kan____  CONCUR WITH DETERMINATION

		Loren G. Harrell
		Director