SUPPLEMENTAL PROCEEDINGS

	IN THE CASE OF:       

 
	BOARD DATE:           8 March 2000
	DOCKET NUMBER:   AR1999026856

	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.  A quorum was present during the further consideration and deliberation.  The findings appearing in proceedings dated 2 September 1998 was affirmed.  The following additional findings, and conclusions, recommendation were adopted by the Board.

 	Mr. W. W. Osborn, Jr.                         	Analyst

	The Board convened at the call of the Director on the above date to reconsider the conclusions and recommendation appearing in proceedings dated 2 September 1998.

	Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr.                 	Chairperson
	Mr. Elzey J. Arledge, Jr.                      	Member
	Mr. Ernest W. Lutz, Jr.                        	Member

	The applicant and counsel, if any, did not appear before the Board.

	The Board considered the following additional evidence:

         Exhibit C - Application for correction of military records

	Exhibit D - Prior proceedings

THE BOARD ADDITIONALLY FINDS:

23. In requesting reconsideration of ABCMR Docket Number AC81-1192D the applicant requests that the October 1992 through June 1993 NCO Evaluation Report (ER) be removed from his records, that he be reconsidered for promotion to pay grade E-8 by a standby board and, if selected, authorized back pay.  He also requests that the financial liability imposed by the report of survey be set aside.

24.  The applicant had successfully appealed the subject NCOER and it should have been removed from his OMPF.   Apparently, this was not completed in an expeditious manner.

25.  Subsequent to the above request the NCOER was apparently removed and the applicant was selected for and promoted to pay grade E-8, however, the previous Board had not authorized correcting his effective date of rank.  The applicant made a telephonic request that this be done.

THE BOARD ADDITIONALLY CONCLUDES:

7.  The previous Board’s failure to authorize a corrected effective date of rank was apparently an oversight. The applicant’s effective date of rank in pay grade 
E-8 should be corrected to what it would have been if he had originally been considered and selected in July 1995 and, if appropriate, he should be considered for promotion to pay grade E-9.

8.  There is no new evidence to demonstrate that the action involved in the report of survey was a reprisal.

THE BOARD ADDITIONALLY RECOMMENDS:

3.  That the individual concerned be promoted with the date of rank and effective date of rank in pay grade E-8 as if he had originally been considered and selected in July 1995, retroactive pay is authorized.  

4.  The individual concerned should be considered for promotion to pay grade 
E-9 by the appropriate standby board(s).

5. That so much of the application as is in excess of the foregoing be denied.

BOARD VOTE:  

__rvo____  __eja___  __ewl___  GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

		___Raymond V. O’Connor, Jr.
		        CHAIRPERSON

 
INDEX

CASE ID	AR1999026856	
SUFFIX		
RECON	 	
DATE BOARDED	20000308	
TYPE OF DISCHARGE	GD	
DATE OF DISCHARGE	 	
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY	   	
DISCHARGE REASON		
BOARD DECISION	MODIFY	
REVIEW AUTHORITY		
ISSUES         1.	131.00	
2.		
3.		
4.		
5.		
6.