MEMORANDUM OF CONSIDERATION

	IN THE CASE OF:   

	BOARD DATE:           5 April 2000
	DOCKET NUMBER:   AR1999028496

	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the record of consideration of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.

	Mr. David H. Keller		Analyst	

  The following members, a quorum, were present:

	Mr. Raymond V. O’Connor Jr. 		Chairperson	
	Mr. Stanley Kelley		Member	
	Mr. Lester Echols		Member	

	The Board, established pursuant to authority contained in 10 U.S.C. 1552, convened at the call of the Chairperson on the above date.  In accordance with Army Regulation 15-185, the application and the available military records pertinent to the corrective action requested were reviewed to determine whether to authorize a formal hearing, recommend that the records be corrected without a formal hearing, or to deny the application without a formal hearing if it is determined that insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

	The applicant requests correction of military records as stated in the application to the Board and as restated herein.

	The Board considered the following evidence:

	Exhibit A - Application for correction of military 
                records
	Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including
	            advisory opinion, if any)

APPLICANT REQUESTS:  That his undesirable discharge be upgraded to honorable.  He also requests that his DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) be corrected to show reason for discharge as convenience of the government, reenlistment code as RE-1, and to reflect his correct social security number.

APPLICANT STATES:  That he was due to be discharged the same date and was unjustly asked to sign a resignation for the good of the service; that he extended 90 days to receive an early separation from Vietnam, where he served 15 months.  In support of his request, he submits a reproduced copy of his social security card.

EVIDENCE OF RECORD:  The applicant's military records show:

He enlisted on 26 January 1968 and, after training, was assigned to Fort Hood, Texas.  In July 1969, he was reassigned to Vietnam.

On 10 December 1968, the applicant was administered nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under Article 15, UCMJ, for misappropriation of a government vehicle.  His punishment included reduction in rank from specialist four to private first class.

The facts and circumstances pertaining to the applicant’s discharge are not on file.  The Report of Transfer or Discharge, DD Form 214, indicates that he was discharged on 24 August 1970 for the good of the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, in lieu of trial by court-martial.  He was issued an Undesirable Discharge Certificate.  In the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that the discharge proceedings were conducted in accordance with law and regulations applicable at the time.

Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.  Chapter 10 of that regulation provides, in pertinent part, that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may at any time after the charges have been preferred, submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial.  A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate.  However, at the time of the applicant’s separation the regulation provided for the issuance of an undesirable discharge.

There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations.

DISCUSSION:  Considering all the evidence, allegations, and information presented by the applicant, together with the evidence of record, applicable law and regulations, it is concluded

1.  The applicant's voluntary request for separation under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 10, for the good of the service, to avoid trial by court-martial, is presumed to be administratively correct and in conformance with applicable regulations.  The Board also presumes administrative regularity in the processing of the applicant’s discharge.  There is nothing in the available records or in anything submitted by the applicant to overcome that presumption.

2.  The applicant's request for a chapter 10 discharge tends to show he wished to avoid the court-martial and the punitive discharge that he might have received.

3.  In order to justify correction of a military record the applicant must show to the satisfaction of the Board, or it must otherwise satisfactorily appear, that the record is in error or unjust.  The applicant has failed to submit evidence that would satisfy the aforementioned requirement.

4.  In order to correct the applicant’s social security number on his DD Form 214, he must submit a statement from the Social Security Administration verifying his correct social security number during his period of military service.

5.  In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's request.  Since there is no basis for granting the portion of his request for upgrade of his discharge, there is likewise no basis for granting his remaining requests.

DETERMINATION:  The applicant has failed to submit sufficient relevant evidence to demonstrate the existence of probable error or injustice.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

_rvo____  ___sk____  ___le___  DENY APPLICATION

						Karl F. Schneider
						Director, Army Review Boards Agency

INDEX

CASE ID	AR1999028496	
SUFFIX		
RECON		
DATE BOARDED	20000405	
TYPE OF DISCHARGE	UD	
DATE OF DISCHARGE	19700824	
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY	AR635-200 CH10	
DISCHARGE REASON	A70.00	
BOARD DECISION	DENY	
REVIEW AUTHORITY		
ISSUES         1.	110.00	
2.	142.00	
3.		
4.		
5.		
6.