SUPPLEMENTAL PROCEEDINGS

	IN THE CASE OF:      

	BOARD DATE:           1 March 2001
	DOCKET NUMBER:   AR2000042528

	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.  A quorum was present during the further consideration and deliberation.  The findings appearing in proceedings dated 12 April 2000 were affirmed.  The following additional findings, conclusions, and recommendation were adopted by the Board.

	Mr. Carl W. S. Chun		Director	
	Mr. Edmund P. Mercanti		Analyst	

	The Board convened at the call of the Director on the above date to reconsider the conclusions and recommendation appearing in proceedings dated 12 April 2000.

	Mr. John H. Kern		Chairperson	
	Mr. Curtis L. Greenway		Member	
	Mr. Richard T. Dunbar		Member	

	The applicant and counsel, if any, did not appear before the Board.

	The Board considered the following additional evidence:

	Exhibit 

THE BOARD ADDITIONALLY FINDS:

7.  On 16 May 2000 the applicant submitted a new application to request that his records be further corrected to show that his Military Occupational Specialty (MOS) was 11B10, not 11B20.

THE BOARD ADDITIONALLY CONCLUDES: 

4.  At the time of the Board’s 12 April 2000 decision in this case, it was the intent of the Board to make the applicant’s record as administratively correct as it should properly have been at the time.

5.  The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows that he was separated from active duty with a General Discharge Certificate at the Expiration of his Term of Service (ETS) in pay grade E-1.  While he had 4 years of creditable service, he had 297 days of lost time during his enlistment.

6.  Army Regulation 600-200 contains the guidance for MOS designations.  Chapter 2 states that the fourth character of a soldier’s MOS is his or her skill level.  Skill level “1” is for soldiers in the ranks of private through corporal.  Skill level “2” is for soldiers in the rank of sergeant, pay grade E-5.

7.  In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS:

That all of the Department of the Army records related to this case be corrected by amending the Board’s recommendation appearing in the proceedings, dated 12 April 2000, to show that the individual concerned was an 11B10, light weapons infantryman, and not the higher skill level 11B20.

BOARD VOTE:

___jhk___  ___clg __  ___rtd__  GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

		__________John H. Kern_______
		        CHAIRPERSON

INDEX

CASE ID	AR2000042528	
SUFFIX		
RECON	YYYYMMDD	
DATE BOARDED	20010301	
TYPE OF DISCHARGE	(HD, GD, UOTHC, UD, BCD, DD, UNCHAR)	
DATE OF DISCHARGE	YYYYMMDD	
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY	AR . . . . .  	
DISCHARGE REASON		
BOARD DECISION	GRANT	
REVIEW AUTHORITY		
ISSUES         1.	100.05	
2.		
3.		
4.		
5.		
6.