SUPPLEMENTAL PROCEEDINGS

	IN THE CASE OF:      

	BOARD DATE:            25 January 2001  
	DOCKET NUMBER:   AR2001051817

	I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual.  A quorum was present during the further consideration and deliberation.  The findings appearing in proceedings dated 9 November 2001 were affirmed.  The following additional findings, conclusions, and recommendation were adopted by the Board.

	Mr. Carl W. S. Chun		Director	
	Ms. Rosa M. Chandler  		Analyst	

	The Board convened at the call of the Director on the above date to reconsider the conclusions and recommendation appearing in proceedings dated 9 November 2000.

	Ms. June Hajjar 		Chairperson	
	Mr. Lester Echols		Member	
	Ms. Karen A. Heinz 		Member	

	The applicant and counsel, if any, did not appear before the Board.

THE BOARD ADDITIONALLY FINDS:

Subsequent to the Board's 9 November 2000 consideration of this case, the US Army Personnel Command (PERSCOM) notified the Board on 3 January 2001 that it does not have the authority to correct the applicant’s Army National Guard Records to show award of the Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal (ARCAM).

THE BOARD ADDITIONALLY CONCLUDES: 

3.  At the time of the Board’s 9 November 2000 decision in this case, it was the intent of the Board to make the applicant’s record as administratively correct as it should properly have been at the time of his discharge from the Pennsylvania ARNG (PAARNG) on 17 December 1993.  

4.  The Board notes that the dates of eligibility for award of the ARCAM specified in paragraph 1 of the previous conclusions are in error and should read from 
28 July 1988 to 27 July 1992 vice the 12 April 1988 through 11 April 1992 dates previously specified.  

5.  In view of the fact that the applicant was discharged from the PAARNG after the eligibility period for award of the ARCAM and was issued an NGB Form 
22, the PAARNG has the authority to correct the applicant’s record and issue him an NGB Form 22A (Correction to NGB Form 22) to show the award of the ARCAM for the period of service 28 July 1988 through 27 July 1992.  

6.  The Board also notes that since the applicant is currently serving in an active duty status, he should provide a copy of the NGB Form 22A to his records custodian so that his active duty records will reflect the new award.

7.  In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below.

THE BOARD RECOMMENDS:

That insofar as the Department of the Army is concerned, the records related to this case should be corrected by amending the Board’s recommendation appearing in the Proceedings, dated 9 November 2000, to show that the Board recommended that the Army National Guard Bureau request that the PAARNG 

provide the individual concerned an NGB Form 22A to show award of the ARCAM for the period of service between 28 July 1988-27 July 1992.

BOARD VOTE:

__jh____  __le_____  __kah___  GRANT AS STATED IN RECOMMENDATION

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

________  ________  ________  DENY APPLICATION

		__June Hajjar_____
		        CHAIRPERSON

INDEX

CASE ID	AR20000051817	
SUFFIX		
RECON	YYYYMMDD	
DATE BOARDED	20010125	
TYPE OF DISCHARGE	(NA))	
DATE OF DISCHARGE	NA	
DISCHARGE AUTHORITY	NA	
DISCHARGE REASON		
BOARD DECISION	(GRANT)	
REVIEW AUTHORITY		
ISSUES         1.	107.000	
2.		
3.		
4.		
5.		
6.