RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 20 March 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20060010891 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Mr. Gerard W. Schwartz Acting Director Ms. Stephanie Thompkins Analyst The following members, a quorum, were present: Ms. Kathleen Newman Chairperson Mr. David K. Haasenritter Member Ms. LaVerne M. Douglas Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, promotion consideration for chief warrant officer five by a special selection board (SSB) under the 2006 year criteria. 2. The applicant states, in effect, that his promotion packet was omitted from the 2006 promotion board consideration list. 3. The applicant provides copies of his Officer Record Brief and his officer evaluation reports for the periods ending 16 May 2004, 16 November 2004, and 16 November 2005, in support of his application. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Based on a review of the applicant’s records by the Office of Promotions, Reserve Components, Human Resources Command – St. Louis, Missouri, it was determined the applicant was erroneously not considered by the 2006 Reserve Components Selection Board and was eligible for consideration for promotion to chief warrant officer five under the 2006 year criteria as an omission. 2. Current promotion policy specifies that promotion consideration/ reconsideration by a SSB may only be based on erroneous non-consideration or material error that existed in the record at the time of consideration. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant’s records were erroneously not considered for promotion to chief warrant officer five under the 2006 year criteria and should now be submitted for appropriate SSB consideration for this purpose. 2. In view of the foregoing findings and conclusions, it would be appropriate to correct the applicant’s records as recommended below. BOARD VOTE: __DKH__ _LMD___ ___KAN__ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: 1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by submitting his records to a duly constituted special selection board for promotion consideration for chief warrant officer five under the 2006 year criteria. 2. That if selected, his records be further corrected by showing he was promoted to chief warrant officer five on his date of eligibility, as determined by appropriate Departmental officials, using the 2006 year criteria, provided he was otherwise qualified and met all other prerequisites for promotion. 3. That if not selected, the applicant be so notified. ______K. A. Newman___ CHAIRPERSON INDEX CASE ID AR20060010891 SUFFIX RECON DATE BOARDED 20070320 TYPE OF DISCHARGE DATE OF DISCHARGE DISCHARGE AUTHORITY DISCHARGE REASON BOARD DECISION GRANT REVIEW AUTHORITY ISSUES 1. 131.00 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.