RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 20 September 2007 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20070007269 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Ms. Catherine C. Mitrano Director Mr. Mohammed R. Elhaj Analyst The following members, a quorum, were present: Mr. Jeffrey C. Redmann Chairperson Mr. Dean A. Camarella Member Mr. Qawiy A. Sabree Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his records to show he was awarded two awards of the Bronze Star Medal. 2. The applicant states that he received two awards of the Bronze Star Medal and that it would mean a lot to himself and his family if his records are corrected to show both awards. 3. The applicant provided copies of the citation and certificate for each award of the Bronze Star Medal in support of his application. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant's records show that he was inducted in the Army of the United States on 3 December 1968. He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantry). The highest grade the applicant attained during his military service was the rank of staff sergeant/pay grade E-6. 3. The applicant’s records show that he served in the Republic of Vietnam during the period 31 December 1969 through 1 September 1970. He was assigned to the 59th Infantry Platoon (Scout Dogs), 11th Infantry Brigade. 4. Item 24 (Decoration, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Bronze Star Medal, the Army Commendation Medal, the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bars (M-14 and M-16), and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machine Gun Bar (M-60). 5. Headquarters, Americal Division, General Orders Number 5246, dated 5 June 1970, show that the applicant was awarded the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious achievement in connection with military operations against a hostile force in the Republic of Vietnam during the period 1 January 1970 through 30 April 1970. 6. Headquarters, Americal Division, General Orders Number 11538, dated 29 August 1970, show that the applicant was awarded the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious achievement in connection with military operations against a hostile force in the Republic of Vietnam during the period 1 May 1970 through 31 August 1970. 7. United States Army Vietnam (USARV) Regulation 672-1 (Military Awards) governed the military awards program in Vietnam during the Vietnam War. This regulation stated that the Bronze Star Medal could be awarded for heroism, meritorious achievement or service which did not involve aerial flight, but which was performed in connection with military operations against an armed enemy including combat, support, and supply operations. An Oak Leaf Cluster is added to denote a second and succeeding award. 8. Review of the applicant's records indicates entitlement to additional awards and decorations that are not shown on his DD Form 214. 9. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows the applicant is entitled to award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 42, dated 1972. 10. Item 24 (Decoration, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. 11. Appendix B of Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) shows that the applicant participated in the Vietnam Winter-Spring 1970, the DA Sanctuary Counteroffensive, and the Vietnam Counteroffensive Phase VII campaigns during his tour of duty in Vietnam. This same regulation states that a bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each campaign. 12. A review of the applicant's service record shows no derogatory information that would disqualify him for the first award of the Good Conduct Medal. 13. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Military Awards), in effect at the time, provides that the Good Conduct Medal is awarded to individuals who have completed a qualified period of active duty enlisted service. This period is 3 years except in those cases when the period for the first award ends with the termination of a period of Federal military service. The enlisted person must have had all “excellent” conduct and efficiency ratings and no convictions by a court-martial. Ratings of "Unknown" for portions of the period under consideration are not disqualifying. Service and efficiency ratings based upon academic proficiency of at least "Good" rendered subsequent to 22 November 1955 are not disqualifying. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant contends that he is entitled to correction of his records to show that he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal with 1st Oak Leaf Cluster. 2. General Orders show the applicant is authorized two awards of the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious achievement in connection with military operations against a hostile force in the Republic of Vietnam. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show both awards. 3. Records show the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his record to show this award. 4. Record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Additionally, records show the applicant participated in three campaigns while serving in the Republic of Vietnam. Therefore, he is entitled to award of three bronze service stars to be affixed to the Vietnam Service Medal. 5. Evidence of record confirms that the applicant served honorably during the period 3 December 1968 through 2 September 1970. Lacking any derogatory information on file that would have disqualified him, it would be appropriate to award the applicant the first award of the Good Conduct Medal based on completion of qualifying service ending with termination of a period of Federal military service. Therefore, he is entitled to correction of his records to show award of the Good Conduct Medal. BOARD VOTE: __jcr___ __dac___ __qas___ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing award of the Bronze Star Medal (1st Oak Leaf Cluster), the Good Conduct Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and three bronze service stars to be affixed to his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal. Jeffrey C. Redmann ______________________ CHAIRPERSON INDEX CASE ID AR20070007269 SUFFIX RECON DATE BOARDED 20070920 TYPE OF DISCHARGE DATE OF DISCHARGE DISCHARGE AUTHORITY DISCHARGE REASON BOARD DECISION (GRANT PLUS) REVIEW AUTHORITY ISSUES 1. 107.0000 2. 3. 4. 5. 6.