IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 June 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080001184 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his records to show award of the Bronze Star Medal. 2. The applicant states that the award was left off his records due to an administrative oversight. 3. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge), dated 17 June 1971, and a copy of certificate, dated 13 February 1970, showing he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal, in support of his application. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant's records show that he enlisted in the Regular Army for a period of 3 years on 29 February 1968. He completed basic combat and advanced individual training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman). The highest rank/grade he attained during this period of military service was specialist four (SP4)/E-4. He was discharged on 17 June 1971. 3. The applicant’s records show that he served in the Republic of Vietnam from 4 March 1969 to 3 March 1970. He was assigned to Company C, 3rd Battalion, 22nd Infantry, 25th Infantry Division (Light). 4. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant’s DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal, the Army Commendation Medal, the Purple Heart, the Combat Infantryman Badge, the Air Medal, and the Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-16). Item 24 does not show award of the Bronze Star Medal. 5. Item 41 (Awards and Decorations) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show award of the Bronze Star Medal. 6. The applicant's records do not contain General Orders showing he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal. 7. During the processing of this case, a member of the Board staff reviewed the Awards and Decorations Computer Assisted Retrieval System (ADCARS) maintained by the Military Awards Branch of the United States Army Human Resources Command (HRC), which is an index of general orders issued during the Vietnam era between 1965 and 1973. This review failed to reveal any Bronze Star Medal orders on file for the applicant. 8. The applicant submitted a copy of certificate, dated 13 February 1970, showing he was awarded the Bronze Star Medal for meritorious achievement in ground operations against hostile forces in the Republic of Vietnam, from March 1969 to March 1970. 9. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Bronze Star Medal is awarded in time of war for heroism and for meritorious achievement or service. As with all personal decorations, formal recommendations, approval through the chain of command, and announcement in orders are required. Recommendations must be made within 2 years of the event or period of service and the award must be made within 3 years. 10. Title 10 of the United States Code, section 1130 (10 USC 1130) provides the legal authority for consideration of proposals for decorations not previously submitted in timely fashion. It allows, in effect, that upon the request of a Member of Congress, the Secretary concerned shall review a proposal for the award or presentation of a decoration (or the upgrading of a decoration), either for an individual or a unit, that is not otherwise authorized to be presented or awarded due to limitations established by law or policy for timely submission of a recommendation for such award or presentation. Based upon such review, the Secretary shall make a determination as to the merits of approving the award or presentation of the decoration. 11. Review of the applicant's records indicates his entitlement to additional awards that are not shown on his DD Form 214. 12. Headquarters, 1st Advanced Individual Training Brigade, Fort Dix, New Jersey, Special Orders Number 133, dated 5 June 1968, show the applicant was awarded the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machinegun Bar (M-60), on 1 June 1968. 13. Headquarters, 1st Advanced Individual Training Brigade, Fort Dix, New Jersey, Special Orders Number 142, dated 17 June 1968, show the applicant was awarded the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14) on 7 June 1968. 14. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) shows that the 3rd Battalion, 22nd Infantry, was awarded the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, from 1 September 1968 to 30 September 1970, based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 5, dated 1973, and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Citation, from 1 August 1967 to 21 January 1970, based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 51, dated 1971. 15. Item 24 (Decoration, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows he was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. 16. Appendix B of Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) shows that the applicant participated in the TET 60 Counteroffensive, the Vietnam Summer-Fall 1969, and the Vietnam Winter-Spring 1970 campaigns during his tour of duty in the Republic of Vietnam. This same regulation states that a bronze service star will be awarded for wear on the Vietnam Service Medal for participation in each campaign. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. There is no evidence in the available records of the award of the Bronze Star Medal other than the certificate submitted by the applicant. Army regulation states that for personal decorations, formal recommendation, approval through the chain of command, and announcement of orders are required. In the absence of orders, there is insufficient evidence to award the applicant the Bronze Star Medal. 2. While the available evidence is insufficient for awarding the applicant the Bronze Star Medal, this in no way affects the applicant’s right to pursue his claim for the Bronze Star Medal by submitting a request through his Member of Congress under the provisions of 10 USC 1130. 3. General Orders awarded the applicant’s unit the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation and the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Citation, which are not shown on his records; therefore, he is entitled to have his records corrected to show these unit awards. 4. The evidence of record shows the applicant was awarded the Vietnam Service Medal. Additionally, records show the applicant participated in three campaigns while serving in the Republic of Vietnam; therefore, he is entitled to award of three bronze service stars to be affixed to the Vietnam Service Medal. 5. Special orders awarded the applicant the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14) and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machinegun Bar (M-60), which are not shown on his records; therefore, he is entitled to have his records corrected to show these awards. 6. Evidence shows that the applicant’s records contain administrative error which does not require action by the Board. Therefore, administrative correction of the applicant’s records will be accomplished by the Case Management Support Division (CMSD), St. Louis, Missouri, as outlined by the Board in paragraph 2 of the BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION section below. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING __XXX __ __XXX__ __XXX__ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: 1. The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned for award of the Bronze Star Medal. 2. The Board determined that administrative error in the records of the individual should be corrected. Therefore, the Board requests that the CMSD-St. Louis administratively correct the records of the individual concerned to show the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, the Republic of Vietnam Civil Actions Honor Medal First Class Citation, the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar (M-14), the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Machinegun Bar (M-60), and three bronze service stars to be affixed to the Vietnam Service Medal, on the applicant's DD Form 214, dated 17 June 1971. ___ XXX ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080001184 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080001184 5 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1