RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 April 2008 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080001849 I certify that hereinafter is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in the case of the above-named individual. Director Analyst The following members, a quorum, were present: Chairperson Member Member The Board considered the following evidence: Exhibit A - Application for correction of military records. Exhibit B - Military Personnel Records (including advisory opinion, if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests award of the Purple Heart. 2. The applicant states that he was injured in his right leg when his unit was ambushed in Vietnam and that he was hospitalized for two weeks. 3. The applicant provides no additional evidence in support of his application. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant enlisted on 3 June 1964 for a period of 3 years. He arrived in Vietnam on 5 February 1966. He served as a light weapons infantryman assigned to Headquarters and Headquarters Company, 2nd Battalion, 35th Infantry in Vietnam from 14 February 1966 through 20 May 1966. He was assigned to Company A, 2nd Battalion, 35th Infantry in Vietnam from 21 May 1966 through 4 February 1967. On 2 June 1967, the applicant was released from active duty in the rank of sergeant after completing 3 years of creditable active service with no time lost. 3. The applicant’s DD Form 214 (Report of Transfer or Discharge) shows the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), the Combat Infantryman Badge, the “Bronze Service Star,” and the “Vietnam Counter Offensive Campaign Medal” as authorized awards. 4. There is no evidence in the available records which shows that the applicant was awarded the Purple Heart or was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. 5. The applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) does not show entitlement to the Purple Heart and item 40 (Wounds) on his DA Form 20 is blank. The applicant's name does not appear on the Vietnam Casualty Roster. 6. On 31 May 1967, the applicant underwent a separation physical examination which makes no mention of any injuries or wounds sustained as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Item 37 (Lower Extremities) on his Standard Form 88 (Report of Medical Examination), dated 31 May 1967, shows he was rated normal. Item 39 (Identifying Body Marks, Scars, Tattoos) on this form shows he had a scar on his left side and a scar on his right thigh. However, there is no evidence that the scar on his right thigh was the result of hostile action in Vietnam. 7. There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Good Conduct Medal. There also is no evidence the applicant was disqualified by his chain of command from receiving the Good Conduct Medal. His records do not contain any adverse information and he received conduct and efficiency ratings of “excellent” throughout his service. 8. Records show the applicant participated in two campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam. 9. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam. This document shows the applicant's unit (Company A, 2nd Battalion, 35th Infantry) is eligible for award of the Valorous Unit Award for actions during the period 2-3 August 1966 based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 17, dated 1968. 10. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 shows the applicant's unit (2nd Battalion, 35th Infantry) is eligible for award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 48, dated 1971. 11. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Purple Heart is awarded for a wound sustained as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify that the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by military medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. 12. Army Regulation 672-5-1, in effect at the time, provided policy and criteria concerning individual military decorations. It stated that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. At the time, a Soldier's conduct and efficiency ratings must have been rated as "excellent" for the entire period of qualifying service except that a service school efficiency rating based upon academic proficiency of at least "good" rendered subsequent to 22 November 1955 was not disqualifying. However, there was no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander made positive recommendation for its award and until the awarding authority announced the award in General Orders. 13. Army Regulation 600-8-22, in pertinent part, authorizes award of a bronze service star, based on qualifying service, for each campaign listed in Appendix B of this regulation and states that authorized bronze service stars will be worn on the appropriate service medal. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. There is no evidence of record which shows that the applicant was wounded as a result of hostile action in Vietnam. Regrettably, there is insufficient evidence on which to base award of the Purple Heart in this case. 2. The applicant was released from active duty in the rank of sergeant with 3 years of creditable active service with no time lost. It appears the applicant met the eligibility criteria for the first award of the Good Conduct Medal based on completion of a period of qualifying service of three years from 3 June 1964 through 2 June 1967. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this award. 3. The applicant participated in two campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which makes him eligible for award of the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars. 4. The applicant’s unit (Company A, 2nd Battalion, 35th Infantry) received the Valorous Unit Award while he was assigned to it. 5. The applicant’s unit (2nd Battalion, 35th Infantry) received the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation while he was assigned to it. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF X______ __X__ __X_____ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: 1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the first award of the Good Conduct Medal for the period 3 June 1964 through 2 June 1967; and b. amending his DD Form 214 to add the Good Conduct Medal, the Valorous Unit Award, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and two bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal. 2. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to award of the Purple Heart. _X___ CHAIRPERSON ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080001849 2 DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS 1901 SOUTH BELL STREET 2ND FLOOR ARLINGTON, VA 22202-4508