IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 February 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20080013038 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his first name on his WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation) from "M****n" to "A**e." 2. The applicant states that his mother did not like his first name. 3. The applicant provides a copy of his WD AGO Form 53-55, dated 8 August 1946, and a copy of his certification of birth dated (issued) 14 October 1969 in support of his request. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant’s military records are not available to the Board for review. A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members’ records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973. It is believed that the applicant’s records were lost or destroyed in that fire. However, there were sufficient documents remaining in a reconstructed record for the Board to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case. 3. The applicant's WD AGO Form 53-55 shows he was inducted in the Army of the United States and entered active duty in Pittsburgh, PA, on 16 April 1946. He completed 8 weeks of basic training at Fort Eustis, VA, and 2 months of Transportation Corps basic training. He was honorably separated on 8 August 1946. 4. Item 1 (Last Name, First Name, Middle Name) of the applicant’s WD AGO Form 53-55 shows his first name as "M****n." 5. The applicant’s WD AGO Form 38 (Report of Physical Examination of Enlisted Personnel Prior to Discharge, Release from Active Duty or Retirement), dated 8 August 1946 lists the applicant’s first name as "M****n." 6. The applicant’s WD AGO Form 100 (Separation Qualification Record), dated 8 August 1946, shows the applicant’s first name as "M****n." 7. The applicant’s War Department Form 372A (Final Payment Worksheet), dated 8 August 1946, shows his first name as "M****n." 8. The applicant provided a copy of his birth certificate, issued on 14 October 1969 that shows his first name as "A**e" and his middle name as "M****n." 9. Army Regulation 600-8-104 (Military Personnel Information Management/ Records) prescribes the policies governing the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF), the Military Personnel Records Jacket, the Career Management Individual File, and Army Personnel Qualification Records. Chapter 2 of this regulation states an OMPF is initiated when the Soldier becomes a member of any Army Component. It further states that once a document is placed in the Official Military Personnel File it becomes a permanent part of that file and will not be removed from that file or moved to another part of the file. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant requests his WD AGO Form 53-55 be corrected to show his first name as "A**e" instead of "M****n." 2. It appears that the applicant used his first name as "M****n" throughout most if not all his entire military service. The first name he used is consistent with the first name that appears on his service records. There is no indication that he used his first name as "A**e." Therefore, the Army records are consistent with the applicant's name at that time. 3. The Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records for historical purposes. The information in those records must reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created. In the absence of compelling information to the contrary, there is no basis for changing the records in this case. 4. A copy of this decisional document, along with the applicant’s application will be filed in his military service records. This should serve to clarify any questions or confusion regarding the applicant’s different first names, and adequately document his first name in his record for the purpose of entitlement to veterans' benefits. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ___X____ ___X____ ___X____ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. XXX _______ _ _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080013038 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20080013038 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1