IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 27 May 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090000429 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests, in effect, correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the National Defense Service Medal, Vietnam Service Medal, Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), and the Combat Infantryman Badge. 2. The applicant makes no statement. 3. The applicant provides no additional documentation in support of his application. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. Review of the applicant's DD Form 214 shows that he was awarded the National Defense Service Medal and the Vietnam Service Medal. Accordingly, these two awards will not be further discussed in these proceedings. 3. On 29 August 1968, the applicant enlisted in the Regular Army for 3 years. He completed his initial training and was awarded military occupational specialty (MOS) 11B (Light Weapons Infantryman). 4. On 7 January 1969, the applicant departed Fort Polk, Louisiana, for duty in the Republic of Vietnam. 5. On 13 February 1969, the applicant was assigned for duty as a rifleman with the 1st Battalion, 7th Cavalry Regiment, 1st Air Cavalry Division. 6. Letter Orders Number 4-1911(F), 1st Air Cavalry Division, dated 19 April 1969, authorized the applicant 15 days of ordinary leave to the United States for compassionate reasons. 7. Item 38 (Record of Assignments) of the applicant's DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record) shows that he was reassigned to the United States on 21 May 1969. He was credited with service in the Republic of Vietnam from 24 January 1969 to 20 May 1969 (3 months and 27 days). 8. On 17 April 1970, the applicant was released from active duty due to hardship. He had attained the rank of private first class, pay grade E-3, and had completed 11 months and 3 days of creditable active duty service. 9. Item 24 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) of the applicant's DD Form 214 lists his awards as the National Defense Service Medal and the Vietnam Service Medal. It does not show award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960) or the Combat Infantryman Badge. 10. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, that the Combat Infantryman Badge is awarded to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS. They must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size. 11. U.S. Army Vietnam Regulation 672-1 (Awards and Decorations), in effect at the time, specifically governed award of the Combat Infantryman Badge to Army forces operating in South Vietnam. This regulation specifically stated that criteria for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge identified the man who trained, lived, and fought as an infantryman and the Combat Infantryman Badge is the unique award established to recognize the infantryman and only the infantryman for his service. Further, "the Combat Infantryman Badge is not an award for being shot at or for undergoing the hazards of day-to-day combat." This regulation also stated the Combat Infantryman Badge was authorized for award to infantry officers and to enlisted and warrant officer persons who have an infantry MOS and required that they must have served in active ground combat while assigned or attached to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental or smaller size. Appendix V of this regulation provided the guidance governing award of the Combat Infantryman Badge. Paragraph 2a stated, in effect, that MOS's, "in the 11 series with the letters B, C, D, F, G, and H," are infantry MOS's. 12. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards) provides, in pertinent part, for award of the Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). This medal was awarded by the Government of Vietnam to all members of the Armed Forces of the United States for qualifying service in Vietnam during the period 1 March 1961 through 28 March 1973. Qualifying service included assignment in Vietnam for 6 months or more. Qualifying service outside the geographical limits of the Republic of Vietnam required the individual to provide direct combat support to the Republic of Vietnam and Armed Forces. Individuals who had qualified for award of the Vietnam Service Medal or the Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal and were evacuated prior to completing 6 months of service due to wounds resulting from hostile action were entitled to award of the Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant contends, in effect, that his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show award of the Combat Infantryman Badge and the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). 2. The evidence clearly shows that the applicant was awarded an infantryman MOS and was assigned to an infantry unit of brigade, regimental, or smaller size while assigned in the Republic of Vietnam. However, it does not sufficiently show that he ever engaged in active ground combat. Therefore, his request for award of the Combat Infantryman Badge should be denied. 3. The evidence of record clearly shows that the applicant did not serve in the Republic of Vietnam for a minimum of 6 months to qualify for award of the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960). Therefore, his request for this award should be denied. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ___X____ ___X ___ ___X___ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. ___________X______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090000429 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090000429 4 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1