IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 26 August 2009 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20090005215 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show award of the Purple Heart. 2. The applicant states that while serving in Vietnam he was hit by shrapnel and small arms while engaging in combat with the enemy. He contends that he was given the Purple Heart but it is not noted on his DD Form 214. 3. The applicant provides a photograph of a Purple Heart medal with his name engraved on it in support of his application. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 5 October 1966. He arrived in Vietnam on 9 March 1967. He served as a stock control and accounting specialist assigned to the 129th Main Support Company in Vietnam from 5 April 1967 through 25 March 1968. On 13 August 1968, he was released from active duty in the rank of specialist four after completing 1 year, 10 months, and 9 days of creditable active service with no time lost. 3. The applicant's DD Form 214 shows the National Defense Service Medal, the Vietnam Service Medal, the Republic of Vietnam Campaign Medal with Device (1960), one overseas service bar, and the Marksman Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle Bar as authorized awards. 4. Valley Forge General Hospital General Orders Number 45, dated 7 August 1968, show the applicant received the Purple Heart for wounds received in action on 10 March 1968 in Vietnam. 5. Records show the applicant participated in two campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam. 6. There is no evidence the applicant received the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal. There also is no evidence the applicant was disqualified by his chain of command from receiving the Army Good Conduct Medal. His records show he received conduct and efficiency ratings of "excellent" throughout his service. 7. Department of the Army Pamphlet 672-3 (Unit Citation and Campaign Participation Credit Register) lists the unit awards received by units serving in Vietnam. This publication shows the 129th Main Support Company was awarded the Meritorious Unit Commendation for actions during the period 1 September 1966 to 1 April 1967 based on Department of the Army General Orders Number 17, dated 1968. 8. Department of the Army General Orders Number 8, 1974, announced award of the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation to Headquarters, U.S. Military Assistance Command, and its subordinate units during the period 8 February 1962 to 28 March 1973 and to Headquarters, U.S. Army Vietnam, and its subordinate units during the period 20 July 1965 to 28 March 1973. 9. Army Regulation 672-5-1 (Decorations and Awards), in effect at the time, provided policy and criteria concerning individual military decorations. It stated that the Army Good Conduct Medal was awarded for each 3 years of continuous enlisted active Federal military service completed on or after 27 August 1940 and, for the first award only, upon termination of service on or after 27 June 1950 of less than 3 years but more than 1 year. At the time, a Soldier's conduct and efficiency ratings must have been rated as "excellent" for the entire period of qualifying service except that a service school efficiency rating based upon academic proficiency of at least "good" rendered subsequent to 22 November 1955 was not disqualifying. However, there was no right or entitlement to the medal until the immediate commander made a positive recommendation for its award and until the awarding authority announced the award in general orders. 10. Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), in pertinent part, authorizes award of a bronze service star based on qualifying service for each campaign listed in appendix B of this regulation and states that authorized bronze service stars will be worn on the appropriate service medal, including the Vietnam Service Medal. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. Orders show the applicant received the Purple Heart. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. 2. The applicant was separated in the rank of specialist four with 24 months of creditable active service with no time lost. It appears the applicant met the eligibility criteria for the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 5 October 1966 through 13 August 1968 based on completion of a period of qualifying service ending with the termination of a period of Federal military service. Therefore, his records should be corrected to show this award. 3. The applicant participated in two campaigns during his assignment in Vietnam which entitles him to award of the Vietnam Service Medal with two bronze service stars. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this award. 4. The applicant’s unit was cited for award of the Meritorious Unit Commendation while he was assigned to it. Therefore, his DD Form 214 should be corrected to show this unit award. 5. The Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation was awarded to all units that served in Vietnam. The applicant served in Vietnam during a qualifying period and is eligible for this award. Therefore, it would be appropriate to add this foreign unit award to his DD Form 214. BOARD VOTE: ____X___ ___X___ ____X___ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. awarding him the first award of the Army Good Conduct Medal for the period 5 October 1966 through 13 August 1968 and b. adding the Purple Heart, the Army Good Conduct Medal, the Meritorious Unit Commendation, the Republic of Vietnam Gallantry Cross with Palm Unit Citation, and two bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded Vietnam Service Medal to his DD Form 214. ____________X_____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090005215 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20090005215 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1