IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 27 July 2010 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20100000903 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his discharge under other than honorable conditions be upgraded to an honorable discharge. 2. He states that he is a homeless veteran and he needs an honorable discharge in order to be eligible for housing through the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Supportive Housing program. 3. He provides no evidence in support of his request. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant's record shows he enlisted in the Regular Army on 25 June 1987 and he was awarded military occupational specialty 91A (Medical Specialist). The highest rank/pay grade he attained while serving on active duty was private/E-2. However, at the time of his discharge, he held the rank/pay grade of private/E-1. 3. His record reveals a disciplinary history that includes: a. adverse counseling statements for being late for duty and failing to remain at his appointed place of duty; and b. acceptance of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) under the provisions of Article 15 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) for disobeying a lawful order by having whiskey in the barracks. 4. A DD Form 458 (Charge Sheet), dated 21 April 1988, shows the applicant was charged with being absent without leave from 15 March 1988 until he returned to military control on 18 April 1988. He was dropped from the rolls of his unit prior to returning to military control. 5. On 25 April 1988, he consulted with legal counsel and was advised of the basis for the contemplated trial by court-martial, the maximum permissible punishment authorized under the UCMJ, the possible effects of an under other than honorable conditions discharge, and of the procedures and rights that were available to him. Following counseling, he submitted a voluntary written request for discharge for the good of the service under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations). In his request for discharge he indicated he understood that by requesting discharge he was admitting guilt to the charge against him or of a lesser included offense that also authorized the imposition of a discharge under other than honorable conditions. He acknowledged he understood that if his discharge request were approved, he could be deprived of many or all Army benefits, that he could be ineligible for many or all benefits administered by the VA, and that he could be deprived of his rights and benefits as a veteran under both Federal and State laws. 6. His chain of command recommended approval of his request and his battalion commander recommended he be discharged under other than honorable conditions. 7. On 12 May 1988, the separation authority approved his request and directed that he be issued a DD Form 794A (Under Other than Honorable Conditions Discharge Certificate). 8. On 18 May 1988, he was discharged under the provisions of chapter 10, Army Regulation 635-200, and issued a DD Form 794A. He had completed 9 months and 20 days of creditable active military service. He also was credited with lost time during the period 15 March 1988 to 17 April 1988. 9. There is no indication he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. 10. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 10 of this regulation provides that a member who has committed an offense or offenses for which the authorized punishment includes a punitive discharge may submit a request for discharge for the good of the service in lieu of trial by court-martial at any time after the charges have been preferred. 11. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7b, provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. A characterization of under honorable conditions may be issued only when the reason for the Soldier's separation specifically allows such characterization. 12. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a, provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant's contention that his discharge under other than honorable conditions should be upgraded to an honorable discharge was carefully considered and determined to be without merit. 2. His record reveals a disciplinary history that includes adverse counseling and acceptance of NJP under the provisions of Article 15 of the UCMJ. 3. His record also shows he was charged with the commission of an offense punishable under the UCMJ with a punitive discharge and he voluntarily requested discharge under the provisions of chapter 10 of Army Regulation 635-200 to avoid a trial by court-martial which may have resulted in a felony conviction. 4. The evidence shows he was properly and equitably discharged in accordance with the regulations in effect at the time. There is no evidence of procedural errors which would have jeopardized his rights. All requirements of law and regulation were met and his rights were fully protected throughout the separation process. Further, his discharge accurately reflects his overall record of service. 5. Based on his record of indiscipline, he is not entitled to an upgrade of his discharge to either an honorable or a general characterization of service. 6. The ABCMR does not amend and/or correct military records solely for the purpose of making the applicant eligible for other programs. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ____x____ ___x_____ ____x____ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. _______ _ _x______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100000903 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20100000903 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1