IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 4 August 2011 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20110002429 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Report of Separation from the Armed Forces of the United States), item 10 (Date of Birth (DOB)) to show he was born in 192 instead of 19. 2. The applicant states he was born in 192 and his DD Form 214 erroneously lists the year as 19. . The applicant provides a copy of his birth certificate in support of the application. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within  years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the -year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant’s military record is not available to the Board for review. A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center (NPRC) in 197. It is believed that the applicant’s records were lost or destroyed in that fire. This case is being considered using the applicant’s DD Form 214 and the document he submitted, along with miscellaneous documents remaining in an NPRC file including separation orders. . The applicant’s DD Form 214 shows he was inducted into the Army on 11 December 1952. Item 10 lists his DOB as 17 February 19. Item 26 (Foreign and/or Sea Service) shows he completed 1 year, 4 months, and 1 day of service. Item 27 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Commendations, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) shows the following awards: * National Defense Service Medal * Korean Service Medal with 1 bronze service star * Combat Infantryman Badge * United Nations Service Medal * Army Good Conduct Medal 4. The DD form 214 confirms the applicant was honorably released from active duty on 21 October 1954, in the rank of private first class, after completing 1 year, 10 months, and 11 days of active military service. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant’s request to correct the DOB listed on his DD Form 214 has been carefully considered. However, his DD Form 214 shows he was separated using a DOB of 17 February 19 and, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is presumed that he served with that DOB. The Army has an interest in maintaining the integrity of its records. The data and information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created. 2. While the applicant’s desire to have the records changed to reflect the DOB listed on the birth certificate he now provides is understood, there is no indication he questioned the DOB at any time during his military service, or at the time he was separated from active duty. Therefore, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis to support compromising the integrity of the Army’s records to satisfy this request at this late date. . A copy of this decisional document, along with his application and associated documents to include the birth certificate will be filed in his Official Military Personnel File. This should serve to clarify any questions or confusion regarding the difference in the DOB recorded on his DD Form 214 and the one on his birth certificate. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ____X____ ____X____ ____X____ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. _______ _ _X______ ___ CHAIRPXERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110002429 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20110002429 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1