IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 September 2012 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20120004740 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests her general discharge be upgraded to honorable. 2. The applicant states: * she suffered from a service-connected mental illness that caused her behavior to be less than admirable * her actions could not be explained at the time 3. The applicant provides: * Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical records * DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 16 August 2007 for a period of 3 years and 2 weeks. She completed her training and was awarded military occupational specialty 74D (chemical operations specialist). She arrived in Iraq on 11 June 2008. 2. On 15 November 2008, nonjudicial punishment (NJP) was imposed against her for disobeying a lawful command (two specifications), failing to repair (four specifications), assaulting a noncommissioned officer, using disrespectful language (two specifications), and disobeying a lawful order (two specifications). 3. On 10 December 2008, she was convicted by a summary court-martial of failing to repair (two specifications), disobeying a lawful command, disobeying a lawful order, and treating a noncommissioned officer with contempt. 4. On 22 April 2009, she was notified of her pending separation for misconduct (patterns of misconduct) under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations), paragraph 14-12b. The unit commander cited her NJP and summary court-martial offenses. 5. On 22 April 2009, she consulted with counsel, acknowledged that she might encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life if a general discharge were issued, and elected not to submit a statement on her own behalf. 6. On 25 April 2009, the separation authority approved the recommendation for discharge and directed the issuance of a general discharge. 7. She departed Iraq on 28 April 2009. 8. On 15 May 2009, she was discharged under honorable conditions (general) under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12b, for misconduct (patterns of misconduct). She completed a total of 1 year, 7 months, and 24 days of creditable active service with 37 days of lost time. 9. There is no evidence of record which shows she was diagnosed with any mental condition prior to her discharge. 10. She provided VA medical records, dated 2011 and 2012, which show: * she was diagnosed with major depression with psychotic features in 2011 * she was treated for schizoaffective disorder and post-traumatic stress disorder in 2011 and 2012 11. On 22 December 2010, the Army Discharge Review Board denied her request for an honorable discharge. 12. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense (military or civilian offense), and convictions by civil authorities. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impracticable or is unlikely to succeed. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally appropriate for a Soldier discharged under this chapter. 13. Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 3-7a provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant contends she suffered from a service-connected mental illness that caused her behavior to be less than admirable. However, there is no evidence which shows she was diagnosed with any mental condition prior to her discharge. There is also no evidence that shows she was having mental problems in 2008/2009 that interfered with her ability to perform her military duties or that this was the underlying cause for the misconduct that led to her discharge. The VA medical records provided by the applicant show she was diagnosed with major depression and psychotic features in 2011. 2. Her record of service included one NJP, one summary court-martial, and 37 days of lost time. As a result, her record of service did not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel. Therefore, the applicant's record of service is insufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. 3. Her administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no indication of procedural errors which would have jeopardized her rights. She had an opportunity to submit a statement in which she could have voiced her concerns; however, she failed to do so. 4. The type of discharge directed and the reasons were therefore appropriate considering all the facts of the case. 5. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ____X____ ____X____ _____X___ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. ______________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120004740 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20120004740 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1