IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 23 January 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130008921 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of WD AGO Form 53-55 (Enlisted Record and Report of Separation – Honorable Discharge) to show his date of birth (DOB) as 3 instead of 2 . 2. The applicant states his original birth certificate shows his correct DOB. 3. The applicant provides of his: * WD AGO Form 53-55 * WD AGO Form 100 (Separation Qualification Record) * Certificate of Birth CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant’s military records are not available for review. A fire destroyed approximately 18 million service members' records at the National Personnel Records Center in 1973. It is believed that the applicant’s records were lost or destroyed in that fire. However, there were sufficient documents provided by the applicant to conduct a fair and impartial review of this case. 3. The applicant was inducted into the Army of the United States on 8 February 1943 and he entered active service on 13 February 1943. He served under the first name as Chester. 4. On 16 January 1946, the applicant was honorably discharged at demobilization. The WD AGO Form 53-55 shows an individual by the first name of Chester with a DOB as 2 . 5. The applicant provides a WD AGO Form 100 and the WD AGO Form 53-55 that show an individual by the first name of Chester with a DOB as 2 . 6. The applicant further provides a Certificate of Birth that shows an individual by the first name of Czeslaw with a DOB of 3 . DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. It is possible that Czeslaw and Chester are one and the same individual and that his correct DOB is 3 ; however, there is no corroborating evidence that the DOB was listed in error at the time of his induction. Therefore, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's requested relief. 2. For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records. The data and information contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created. In the absence of a showing of material error or injustice, there is a reluctance to recommend that those records be changed. While it is understandable the applicant desires to now record his correct DOB in his military records, there is not a sufficiently compelling reason for compromising the integrity of the Army’s records at this late date. 3. The applicant is advised that a copy of this decisional document will be filed in his Army Military Human Resource Record (AMHRR), formerly known as the Official Military Personnel File (OMPF). This should serve to clarify any questions or confusion in regard to the difference in the DOB recorded on his separation document and to satisfy his desire to have his correct DOB documented in his AMHRR. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ___x____ ____x___ ____x____ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. _______ _ _x______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130008921 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130008921 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1