IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 20 February 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130010801 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests an exception to policy to transfer educational benefits to his wife and/or two children under the transfer of educational benefits (TEB) provision of the Post-9/11 GI Bill. 2. The applicant states during his final outprocessing at the Education Center, Schofield Barracks, HI, the woman assured him and his wife that the GI Bill was set up and transferrable. He asked if he needed to do anything else and she said "not until someone is ready to use it." He served for 9 years and 6 months and this is a benefit that he earned. 3. The applicant provides a DD Form 214 (Worksheet) (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 6 November 2003. He served in a variety of stateside or overseas assignments and he attained the rank/grade of staff sergeant (SSG)/E-6. 2. He underwent a pre-separation briefing on 30 April 2012 wherein he checked the "Yes" block in item 13a (Education/Training - Education Benefits (Montgomery GI Bill)) of his DD Form 2648 (Preseparation Counseling Checklist for Active Component Service Members) in anticipation of his upcoming retirement. Items checked "Yes" are mandatory for service members to receive further information or counseling or attend additional workshops, briefings, classes, etc. 3. On 11 April 2013, he was retired by reason of temporary disability, and on 12 April 2013, he was placed on the temporary disability retired list (TDRL) in his retired rank/grade of SSG/E-6. He completed 9 years, 5 months, and 6 days of creditable active service. 4. Public Law 110-252 limits the eligibility to transfer unused benefits to those members of the Armed Forces who are serving on active duty or a member of the Selected Reserve. a. A Soldier must be currently on active duty or a member of the Selected Reserve at the time of transfer of educational benefits to his or her dependent (on or after 1 August 2009). The applicant's last day in military service was 11 April 2013. He would have been eligible to transfer the benefits if he transferred before he left military service. b. A Soldier must have at least 6 years of eligible service in order to transfer educational benefits to a spouse and at least 10 years of eligible service to transfer to eligible children. The applicant in this case had 9 years, 5 months, and 6 days of service upon his retirement, so he may have been eligible to transfer the benefit to his spouse (if he had completed the request before leaving military service). c. A Soldier may only transfer to eligible family members. To be considered an eligible family member the spouse or child must be enrolled in the Dependent Eligibility Enrollment Reporting System (DEERS) and be eligible for DEERS benefits. Children lose eligible family member status upon turning age 21 or at marriage. Eligible family member status can be extended from age 21 to age 23 only if the child is enrolled as a full-time student and unmarried (verified by DEERS). Wards of State are not eligible for the benefits. Once the benefits are transferred, children may use the benefits up to age 26. The applicant's records show he was married to Meaghan and they have two daughters born in 2006 and 2009 respectively. d. A Soldier must also agree to serve the prescribed additional service obligation based on the time the Soldier had in service on 1 August 2009. If the applicant transferred his benefits prior to leaving military service he would have incurred an additional service obligation. e. A Soldier must have no adverse action flag and have an honorable discharge to transfer the benefits. There is no evidence of an adverse action in the applicant's record. He received an honorable discharge. f. A Soldier should not be granted relief based on unawareness of the law, program rules, or procedures unless he or she left the service during the implementation phase (first 90 days) of the program. The Army, Department of Defense (DOD), and VA initiated a massive public campaign plan that generated major communications through military, public, and social media venues on the Post-9/11 GI Bill and subsequent transfer of educational benefits. The applicant's last day in the service was 11 April 2013 which was not within 90 days after the program's implementation. g. A Soldier must initially request to transfer benefits on the DOD TEB online database. The TEB online database was operational 29 June 2009. Once approved in the TEB online database by the Soldier's service, the approval information is automatically relayed for VA access. The respective dependent must then submit an application for VA educational benefits, VA Form 22-1990e, to request to use the benefits. The applicant claims he was assured he did not have to do anything, so none of the required steps to transfer benefits were taken. h. Changes to the amount of months allocated to family members can be made at anytime, to include once a member leaves military service, provided the service member allocates at least 1 month of benefits prior to separation. If the service member allocates 0 months and subsequently leaves military service, he or she is not authorized to transfer unused benefits. i. The VA is restricted to pay for education benefits by compensating no more than one retroactive year from the date a claim is received by the VA. No evidence was provided by the applicant that his dependents made a previous claim to the VA 5. On 22 June 2009, DOD established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused educational benefits to eligible family members. The policy states any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of the approval of the individual's request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and a. has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election; or b. has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election, is precluded by either standard policy (service or DOD) or statute from committing to 4 additional years, and agrees to serve for the maximum amount of time allowed by such policy or statute, or c. is or becomes retirement eligible during the period from 1 August 2009 through 1 August 2013. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service. 6. The policy further states the Secretaries of the Military Departments will provide active duty participants and members of the Reserve Components with qualifying active duty service individual pre-separation or release from active duty counseling on the benefits under the Post-9/11 GI Bill and document accordingly and maintain records for individuals who receive supplemental educational assistance under Public Law 110-252, section 3316. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant was eligible to transfer his education benefits under the TEB prior to retirement, but he did not do so. The program was implemented in July 2009 and he retired on 11 April 2013. Prior to retirement, he did not apply for the transfer of benefits while on active duty. 2. The Army, DOD, and VA conducted massive public campaigns that generated major communications through military, public, and social media venues. The information was published well in advance with emphasis on the criteria. A Soldier must meet various criteria to qualify for transfer of benefits to an eligible family member; most importantly, the Soldier must be on active duty or in the Selected Reserve at the time of transfer. 3. The applicant continued to serve until he retired in April 2013. His service and his sincerity are not in question; however, since the applicant has been on active duty since the program was implemented in August 2009, nearly 4 years after the program was implemented, he had sufficient time to submit his application and/or to verify that his application was submitted in the proper manner. There is no evidence he exercised due diligence. 4. There is neither an error nor an injustice in the applicant's transfer of benefits processing. In view of the foregoing, he is not entitled to the requested relief. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ____X____ ___X_____ ____X____ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. _______ _ __X_____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130010801 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130010801 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1