BOARD DATE: 10 April 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130012500 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests approval of Transfer of Educational Benefits (TEB) under the Post-9/11 GI Bill to her dependents. 2. The applicant states, in effect, prior to separating from the Army on 31 August 2009 she was not given the information/opportunity to transfer her Post-9/11 GI Bill education benefits to her dependents. She states that in conjunction with her retirement she began transition leave prior to the program being enacted. Therefore the topic was not discussed during her transition counseling and it was not explained that she must transfer her benefits before she retired from the Army. She would have transferred her education benefits to eligible dependents had she been afforded the opportunity. 3. The applicant provides her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant retired on 31 August 2009 by reason of sufficient service for retirement. She completed 20 years and 19 days of creditable active service. 3. On 22 June 2009, the Department of Defense (DOD) established the criteria for eligibility and transfer of unused education benefits to eligible family members. The policy states an eligible member is any member of the Armed Forces on or after 1 August 2009 who, at the time of the approval of the individual's request to transfer entitlement to educational assistance under this section, is eligible for the Post-9/11 GI Bill and: a. has at least 6 years of service in the Armed Forces on the date of election and agrees to serve 4 additional years in the Armed Forces from the date of election; or b. has at least 10 years of service in the Armed Forces (active duty and/or Selected Reserve) on the date of election, is precluded by either standard policy (service or DOD) or statute from committing to 4 additional years, and agrees to serve the maximum amount of time allowed by such policy or statute; or c. is or becomes retirement eligible during the period 1 August 2009 through 1 August 2013. A service member is considered to be retirement eligible if he or she has completed 20 years of active duty or 20 qualifying years of Reserve service. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant was fully eligible to transfer her education benefits under the TEB prior to retirement, but she did not do so. The program was implemented in August 2009 and she retired on 31 August 2009. Prior to retirement, it does not appear she applied for the transfer of benefits while on active duty. 2. The DOD, VA, and the Army conducted massive public campaigns that generated major communications through military, public, and social media venues. The information was published well in advance with emphasis on the criteria. A Soldier must meet various criteria to qualify to transfer benefits to an eligible dependent. 3. Nevertheless, during the initial implementation of this new program, many Soldiers at all grades were confused regarding their eligibility and/or the procedure to apply for such benefit. This confusion was exacerbated with heavy use of the DOD website and the lack of proper log-in credentials for those who may have signed out on transition leave within 60 to 90 days of the program's implementation. Similarly, officials at some education centers may have also been confused regarding the implementation instructions and may not have conducted proper counseling. 4. The applicant's retirement date was 31 August 2009. It is reasonable to presume that had the applicant been aware of the procedure to transfer her benefits while on active duty she would have done so. Therefore, as a matter of equity, her records should be corrected to show she did so in a timely manner prior to her effective date of retirement. BOARD VOTE: _x___ ___x_____ __x______ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant a recommendation for relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by showing the applicant filed her application and the Army approved her request to transfer Post 9/11 GI Bill benefits to her family members prior to her retirement, provided all other program eligibility criteria are met. _______ _ x _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130012500 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130012500 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1