IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 20 March 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130012606 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests item 24 (Character of Service) of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) for the period ending 15 January 1991 be corrected to show his character of service as "honorable" instead of "uncharacterized." 2. The applicant states he: * completed basic and advanced individual training (AIT) and was sent back to his Army National Guard (ARNG) unit after successful completion of all requirements * was not released early and did graduate from AIT * believes his character of service should be honorable because he completed his obligation and was not separated for performance or conduct * is currently a Federal employee and this term of service is not being credited due to his service being uncharacterized instead of honorable as it should be 3. The applicant provides a copy of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 15 January 1991. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant enlisted in the ARNG on 13 August 1990. He was ordered to active duty for training (ADT) on 3 September 1990. On 15 January 1991, he was released from ADT after completing 4 months and 13 days of creditable active service. He was transferred to his ARNG unit to complete his remaining service obligation. 3. Item 24 of his DD Form 214 for the period ending 15 January 1991 shows the entry "UNCHARACTERIZED." 4. He was honorably discharged from the ARNG on 13 August 2005. 5. Army Regulation 635-5 (Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents prepared for Soldiers upon retirement, discharge, or release from active military service or control of the Army. It establishes standardized policy for the preparation of the DD Form 214. It states the DD Form 214 is a synopsis of the Soldier's most recent period of continuous active duty. It provides a brief, clear-cut record of active Army service at the time of release from active duty, retirement, or discharge. 6. It further states that chapter 4 provides for the discharge or release from active duty upon termination of enlistment and other periods of active duty or ADT. The regulation states that a separation will be described as an entry-level separation with service uncharacterized if processing is initiated while a Soldier is in an entry-level status. Entry-level status is defined as the first 180 days of continuous active service. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant contends the character of service shown on his DD Form 214 for the period ending 15 January 1991 is incorrect. 2. The evidence shows he was ordered to ADT in 1990 for a period of 4 months and 13 days. Since he was in an entry-level status when he was released from active duty in 1991, his character of service was uncharacterized which is properly reflected in item 24 of his DD Form 214. 3. An uncharacterized discharge is not meant to be a negative reflection of a Soldier’s military service. It merely means the Soldier has not been in the Army long enough for his or her character of service to be rated as honorable or otherwise. 4. In view of the foregoing, there is no basis for granting the applicant's requested relief. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ____X___ ___X___ ___X____ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. _______ _ X _______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130012606 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130012606 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1