BOARD DATE:	  10 April 2014

		DOCKET NUMBER:  AR20130013023 


THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE:

1.  Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any).

2.  Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any).


THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant requests an upgrade of his bad conduct discharge.

2.  The applicant states he believes he is being punished for something he unknowingly did.  He has been unable to find meaningful work because of his discharge.

3.  The applicant provides no additional evidence.

CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE:

1.  The applicant, a specialist in the Alabama Army National Guard, was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom effective 25 October 2008.

2.  On 8 September 2009 while serving in Iraq, the applicant pled guilty and was found guilty of violation of Article 134, Uniform Code of Military Justice, for conduct which was prejudicial to good order and discipline or was of a nature to bring discredit upon the Armed Forces by possessing child pornography on his laptop computer and external hard drives.

3.  The finding and adjudged sentence consisted of confinement for 36 months and a bad conduct discharge.  The general court-martial convening authority approved the finding and sentence, but reduced the confinement to 15 months and, except for the bad conduct discharge, he ordered the sentence executed.  He further credited the applicant with 30 days of confinement against the approved sentence to confinement.  
4.  The U.S. Army Court of Criminal Appeals affirmed the finding and sentence but corrected the credited confinement to 37 days.

5.  On 1 July 2010, the provisions of Article 71(c), Uniform Code of Military Justice, having been complied with, the bad conduct discharge was ordered executed.

6.  The applicant was discharged on 17 September 2010 due to court-martial under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Active Duty Enlisted Administrative Separations), chapter 3.  He completed 1 year and 3 days of net active duty service during this period and 2 years, 8 months, and 1 day of total service.

7.  Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel.

	a.  Paragraph 3-7a provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law.  The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate.

	b.  Paragraph 3-7b provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions.  When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge.

	c.  Paragraph 3-11 provides that a Soldier will be given a bad conduct discharge pursuant only to an approved sentence of a general or special court-martial.  The appellate review must be completed and the affirmed sentence ordered duly executed.

DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS:

1.  The applicant's trial by court-martial was warranted by the gravity of the offense for which he was charged.  His conviction and discharge were effected in accordance with applicable law and regulations and his rights were protected throughout the court-martial process.

2.  His claim that he is being punished for something he unknowingly did was considered; however, he pled guilty to the offense with full knowledge of the expected consequences.
3.  In view of the foregoing evidence, his request for an upgrade of his discharge should be denied.

BOARD VOTE:

________  ________  ________  GRANT FULL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF 

________  ________  ________  GRANT FORMAL HEARING

___X_____  __X______  _X____  DENY APPLICATION

BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION:

The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice.  Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned.




      ___________X______________
                  CHAIRPERSON
      
I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case.

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130013023



3


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1

ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont)                                         AR20130013023



2


ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

 RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS


1