IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 25 March 2014 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20130013393 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests an upgrade of her general discharge under honorable conditions to fully honorable. 2. The applicant states her DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) should be corrected to show a fully honorable discharge to coincide with her Honorable Discharge Certificate from the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) in 2008. She further states that two records of nonjudicial punishment (NJP) should not justify discharging her for misconduct. 3. The applicant provides a self-authored letter to the Board explaining her circumstances at the time and a copy of her Honorable Discharge Certificate. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant enlisted in the USAR on 11 January 2000 under the Delayed Entry Program. She was discharged from the USAR on 4 July 2000 for immediate enlistment in the Regular Army. She enlisted in the Regular Army on 5 July 2000 for a period of 3 years and training as a unit supply specialist. She completed her training and was transferred to Fort Bliss, Texas, for assignment to a Patriot battery. 2. On 26 February 2002, NJP was imposed against her for failing to report to her place of duty, being disrespectful in language toward a superior noncommissioned officer (NCO), and being derelict in the performance of her duties. 3. On 10 June 2002, NJP was imposed against her for two specifications of leaving her place of duty without authority, disobeying a lawful order from an NCO, and two additional specifications of disobeying lawful orders. 4. On 12 July 2002, the applicant's commander notified her that he was initiating action to discharge her from the service under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations – Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 14-12b, by reason of a pattern of misconduct. He cited the applicant's disciplinary record and her failure to respond to repeated counseling as the basis for his recommendation. 5. After consulting with counsel, the applicant elected not to submit a statement in her own behalf. 6. On 16 July 2002, the appropriate authority approved the recommendation for discharge and directed the issuance of a General Discharge Certificate. 7. Accordingly, she was discharged under honorable conditions due to misconduct on 30 July 2002 under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, chapter 14. She completed 2 years and 26 days of active service. 8. On 8 July 2008, orders were published which honorably discharged the applicant from the USAR. 9. The applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board (ADRB) in December 2012 requesting an upgrade of her discharge. After reviewing the applicant's contentions and available evidence, the ADRB determined her discharge was both proper and equitable under the circumstances and voted unanimously to deny her request for an upgrade of her discharge. 10. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 establishes policy and procedures for separating personnel for misconduct. Specific categories included minor infractions, a pattern of misconduct, involvement in frequent incidents of a discreditable nature with civil and military authorities, and commission of a serious offense, which includes drug offenses. Although an honorable or general discharge is authorized, a discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally considered appropriate. 11. Paragraph 3-7a of Army Regulation 635-200 provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member's service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant's contentions regarding her discharge have been noted; however, they are not sufficiently mitigating when compared to the repeated nature of her misconduct. The applicant's overall service simply did not rise to the level of a fully honorable discharge. 2. The applicant's administrative separation was accomplished in compliance with applicable regulations with no indication of procedural errors which would tend to jeopardize his rights. 3. Accordingly, the characterization and the narrative reason for separation were appropriate for the circumstances of her case. 4. It should also be noted that the orders discharging her from the USAR were apparently issued in error because she was not transferred to the USAR when she was discharged. However, it has long been the policy of the Board not to make an applicant worse off than when he or she applied; accordingly, the Board will not revoke the discharge. 5. In the absence of evidence showing an error or injustice occurred in her case, there appears to be no basis to grant her request. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ____x___ ____x___ ___x____ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. _____________x____________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130013393 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20130013393 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1