IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 10 February 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150000346 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests a review of the military disability evaluation pertaining to a mental health (MH) condition. 2. The applicant states, in effect, the case file should be reviewed in accordance with the Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of members who were referred for a disability evaluation between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 and whose MH diagnosis was changed during that process. 3. The applicant submitted an application through the DOD Physical Disability Board of Review (PDBR) MH Special Review Panel (SRP). CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. The PDBR SRP conducted a comprehensive review of the applicant’s submissions and records for evidence of inappropriate changes in the diagnosis of a MH condition during processing through the military disability system. 2. The Department of Defense memorandum, dated 27 February 2013, directed the Service Secretaries to conduct a review of MH diagnoses for service members completing a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 in order to determine if service members were disadvantaged by a changed diagnosis over the course of their physical disability process. 3. In the processing of this case, an advisory opinion was obtained from the PDBR SRP and the applicant was provided a copy. 4. The applicant did not respond to the advisory opinion. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. After a comprehensive review of the applicant’s case, the SRP determined by unanimous vote that there should be no change of the applicant’s disability and separation determination. 2. The SRP considered the appropriateness of changes in the applicant's MH diagnoses; physical evaluation board (PEB) fitness determination; and if unfitting, whether the provisions of Department of Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) Section 4.129 were applicable; and whether a disability rating recommendation in accordance with VASRD Section 4.130 was required. 3. The SRP reviewed the records for evidence of inappropriate changes in diagnosis of the MH condition during processing through the Integrated Disability Evaluation System (DES). The SRP agreed the evidence of the available records reflected a diagnoses of adjustment disorder with anxiety medical evaluation board (MEB) and VA, pain disorder associated with psychological factors and general medical condition, and anxiety disorder not otherwise specified (NOS) were rendered from behavioral health in the service treatment records (STR). The MEB and VA rendered adjustment disorder with anxiety as the final diagnosis; therefore, no diagnostic variance was provided. The SRP determined the applicant did not meet the inclusion criteria in the Terms of Reference of the MH Review Project. 4. The SRP agreed that evidence of the record reflected minimal MH related symptoms. Adjustment disorder with anxiety was a condition that did not constitute a physical disability. The applicant was never hospitalized psychiatrically, was never seen in the emergency room for MH concerns, never had suicidal or homicidal ideation, and there was no history of domestic violence. There was no clinical evidence that his condition caused significant impairment in social or occupational functioning. The commander’s statement indicated applicant was functioning in his military occupational specialty, did not have acceptable level of attention and concentration to complete tasks in a timely manner but worked well with supervisors and peers, made reasonable decisions, communicated well, came to work every day, and could remember work procedures and instructions. Additionally, an MH condition was never profiled. 5. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the SRP determined the adjustment disorder with anxiety was the appropriate diagnosis at time of separation. 6. The available evidence shows the SRP’s assessment should be accepted. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ____X____ ___X_____ ____X____ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. ____________X___________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20040003532 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20150000346 2 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1