IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 24 September 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150002907 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests his discharge be upgraded to honorable. 2. The applicant states, in effect, that prior to his enlistment he spent 11 months in a drug treatment center but he still excelled as a Soldier. However, when he returned from Korea he did not get the support he needed to maintain his exceptional record. His achievements include promotion to specialist (SPC/E-4) in less than a year as well as award of the Army Achievement Medal, Army Service Ribbon, Overseas Service Ribbon, Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge, and Sharpshooter Marksmanship Qualification Badge. 3. The applicant provides medical records and his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty). CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 21 April 1987. He was trained in and served in military occupational specialty 94B (Food Service Specialist) and was subsequently assigned to Korea. 3. A review of his records shows that: a. On 14 January 1988, he was enrolled (self-referred) into Track II of the Alcohol and Drug Abuse Prevention and Control Program (ADAPCP) in Korea. His 1st Client Progress Report, dated 14 April 1988, shows that his treatment included individual counseling, group counseling, Antabuse, and participation in Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) meetings. b. He was arrested on 24 January 1989 at Fort Stewart, GA , and charged with driving while intoxicated (DUI), driving on a suspended license, and underage drinking. c. His disciplinary record includes an Article 15 for being absent without leave (AWOL) from 14-16 February 1989, driving on a suspended license, and underage drinking. d. He underwent a Mental Status Evaluation on 28 February 1989 which cleared him for any administrative action deemed appropriate by his command and recommended that he be allowed to attend AA meetings until his discharge. 4. On 6 April 1989, the applicant's unit commander notified the applicant he was initiating action to separate him under the provisions of paragraph 14-12c, Army Regulation 635-200 (Personnel Separations Enlisted Personnel), by reason of commission of a serious offense. He cited the applicant's 2 DUIs within 30 days. 5. On 7 April 1989, the applicant consulted with legal counsel and he was advised of the basis for the contemplated separation action, its effects, of the rights available to him, and of the effect of a waiver of those rights. He acknowledged he may encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life if he received a general discharge under honorable conditions. After this counseling, the applicant voluntarily waived consideration of his case by an administrative separation board and elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf or be represented by military counsel. 6. The separation authority approved the applicant's separation under the provisions of paragraph 14-12c, Army Regulation 635-200, and directed the issuance of a General Discharge Certificate. 7. Accordingly, the applicant was discharged on 25 April 1989. His DD Form 214 shows he completed 2 years and 5 days of net active service this period. 8. He provides medical records which document a history of substance abuse beginning at age 10. He admitted to abusing “alcohol, PCP, LSD, hash, and cocaine” but contended that he had been rehabilitated at age 17. 9. There is no evidence that the applicant applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within that board's 15-year statute of limitations. 10. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, and convictions by civil authorities. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impracticable or is unlikely to succeed. A discharge under other than honorable conditions is normally appropriate for a Soldier discharged under this chapter. However, the separation authority may direct a general discharge if such is merited by the Soldier’s overall record. a. Paragraph 3-7a provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel, or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate. b. Paragraph 3-7b provides that a general discharge is a separation from the Army under honorable conditions. When authorized, it is issued to a Soldier whose military record is satisfactory but not sufficiently meritorious to warrant an honorable discharge. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant requests upgrade of his discharge to honorable. 2. Evidence shows the applicant was equitably and properly discharged in accordance with regulations in effect at the time. The type of discharge directed and the reasons for separation were appropriate considering all the facts of the case. The records contain no evidence of procedural or other errors that would have jeopardized his rights. 3. His contention that he did not receive support for his substance abuse cannot be confirmed or denied based on the available evidence, but the record shows that he was enrolled in the ADAPCP while assigned to Korea and that he participated voluntarily. The results of his treatment are not part of the record but it is clear that he continued to struggle with substance abuse upon his arrival at Fort Stewart, GA as reflected in his disciplinary history of DUI, underage drinking, and driving under a suspended license. As such, he did not meet the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel. 4. In view of the foregoing, there is an insufficient evidentiary basis for granting the applicant's request. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ____X____ ___X_____ ___X_____ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. ____________X__________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20150002907 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20150002907 4 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1