IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 October 2015 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150003304 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests that his general, under honorable conditions discharge be upgraded to honorable. 2. The applicant states that he is a hard worker, devoted father, and a creditable and respected individual in his community. 3. The applicant provides three character references. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant's failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant's failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The applicant enlisted in the Regular Army on 24 January 1991 and completed training as a medical specialist. The highest rank/grade he attained during his period of service was specialist/ E-4. 3. He received nonjudicial punishment on 10 February 1993 for willfully disobeying a lawful command. 4. On 24 May 1993, the applicant's company commander informed him he was initiating action to separate him for a pattern of misconduct with a general discharge under honorable conditions under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200 (Enlisted Separations - Enlisted Personnel), paragraph 14-12b. The reasons cited were his bar to reenlistment, Summarized Article 15 for disobeying an officer, Field Grade Article 15 for the wrongful possession of another Soldier’s identification card, and counseling for indebtedness and failure to return property. 5. On the same day, he acknowledged receipt of notification of the basis for the contemplated action to separate him and of the rights available to him, including his right to consult with counsel prior to submitting his election of rights. 6. He consulted with counsel, who advised him of the basis for the contemplated separation action and its effects, the rights available to him, and the effect of a waiver of his rights. He acknowledged he understood he could expect to encounter substantial prejudice in civilian life if a general discharge were issued to him. He waived his rights and he elected not to submit a statement in his own behalf. 7. On 14 June 1993, the separation authority approved his discharge under the provisions of Army Regulation 635-200, paragraph 14-12b, pattern of misconduct, and directed the issuance of a general discharge. On 18 June 1993, the applicant was discharged accordingly. He had completed a total of 2 years, 4 months, and 25 days of creditable active duty service. 8. There is no indication that he applied to the Army Discharge Review Board for an upgrade of his discharge within its 15-year statute of limitations. 9. He provides three character references that state the applicant is a trustworthy, straightforward, truthful, hardworking, and loyal person. 10. Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. a. Chapter 14 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense that could result in a punitive discharge, convictions by civil authorities, desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impracticable or is unlikely to succeed. b. Paragraph 3-7a provides that an honorable discharge is a separation with honor and entitles the recipient to benefits provided by law. The honorable characterization is appropriate when the quality of the member’s service generally has met the standards of acceptable conduct and performance of duty for Army personnel (emphasis added), or is otherwise so meritorious that any other characterization would be clearly inappropriate. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The evidence of record does not support the applicant's request for an upgrade of his general under honorable conditions discharge. 2. His post-service achievements are not in question; however, the evidence of record shows the applicant was barred from reenlistment and he accepted NJP on two occasions. Considering all the facts in this case, his general discharge was appropriate. All requirements of law and regulation were met and his rights were fully protected throughout the separation process. The available evidence is an insufficient basis upon which to grant the requested relief. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ___x____ ___x____ ___x____ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: The evidence presented does not demonstrate the existence of a probable error or injustice. Therefore, the Board determined that the overall merits of this case are insufficient as a basis for correction of the records of the individual concerned. _______ _ x_______ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20150003304 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20150003304 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1