IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 12 January 2016 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150006002 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests reconsideration of his request for award of the Purple Heart (PH). He also requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Certificate of Release or Discharge from Active Duty) to show all of his awards and military education. 2. The applicant states the new evidence supports his entitlement to award of the PH. a. He states the new evidence shows he entered a vehicle without a shrapnel wound, the vehicle was later attacked by an improvised explosive device (IED), and other Soldiers knew that he was in the vehicle and also witnessed the attack. (1) A Soldier who was in the same vehicle sustained injuries during the attack. The Solder was evacuated, received treatment for his wounds, and was awarded the PH. (2) The applicant states he sustained a shrapnel wound during the same attack and received treatment for his injuries, including the shrapnel wound. He has always acknowledged that there is not a Standard Form (SF) 600 (Medical Record) to substantiate his injury. However, a medical professional later made notes in his medical records that indicate the wounds were such that they would have required treatment by a medical officer had one been available. (3) The notation in his Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) medical record was dismissed as evidence by the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) because the "document only addresses what his military history suggests." He maintains that MILPER Message 11-125 does not dictate any time limit on the statement and it does not specifically exclude medical records from the VA as official medical records. (4) He asserts that this new evidence fills in all previous gaps and provides unequivocal evidence to support his entitlement to award of the PH. Specifically, that the shrapnel wound he sustained was due to the explosion of the IED which was the result of enemy action. b. He also requests correction of his 28 March 2005 DD Form 214 to show the Ranger Tab, Pathfinder Badge, Air Assault Badge, Iraq Campaign Medal, and Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award). (1) He served on active duty multiple times and received a DD Form 214 to document each period of active duty; however, some of his awards and all of his military education were omitted from his final (28 March 2005) DD Form 214. He also states that the DD Form 214 Continuation Page was not transcribed onto an official form, such as a DD Form 215 (Correction to DD Form 214), and it was not filed in his Official Military Personnel File (OMPF) until April 2014. (2) He offers a number of reasons for the errors (e.g., numerous periods of active duty, lack of training and/or error of human resources personnel, and his lack of understanding for entering information on the DD Form 214). As an example, he points out that in April 2011 the ABCMR corrected his records to add the Drill Sergeant Identification Badge and Military Free Fall Parachutist Badge and a DD Form 215 was issued to add the badges to his 28 March 2005 DD Form 214. He requests all of his other awards and military education also be added to this DD Form 214 in a similar manner. 3. The applicant provides copies of – * two self-authored statements (summarized above) * three DD Forms 214 * Continuation Page to DD Form 214 * two DD Forms 215 * DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record) * ABCMR Record of Proceedings AR20100023711, dated 5 April 2011 * VA Progress Notes, dated 17 November 2014 * two supporting statements CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Incorporated herein by reference are military records which were summarized in the previous consideration of the applicant's case by the ABCMR in Docket Number AR20140006453 on 11 December 2014. 2. The applicant served in the Active and the Reserve Components of the U.S. Army from the date of his entry in the Delayed Entry Program on 27 June 1983 through the date of his transfer to the U.S. Army Reserve (USAR) Control Group (Retired Reserve) effective 28 March 2005. 3. A DD Form 214 shows the applicant entered active duty this period on 30 November 1983, was honorably released from active duty (REFRAD) on 9 March 1988, and transferred to a USAR unit. It also shows in – a. item 13 (Decorations, Medals, Badges, Citations and Campaign Ribbons Awarded or Authorized) the – * Army Service Ribbon * Army Lapel Button * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle (M-16) Bar * Expert Infantryman Badge * Ranger Tab * Parachute Badge * Army Achievement Medal (2nd Award) * Army Good Conduct Medal b. item 14 (Military Education) – * Basic Airborne Training, 3 Weeks, 1984 * Military Free Fall Parachute Course, 5 Weeks, 1986 * Ranger Course, 8 Weeks, 1987 * Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape Course, 2 Weeks, 1986 * Scout Indoctrination Program, 2 Weeks, 1985 * Rough Terrain Parachute Training Course, 1 Week, 1986 4. A DD Form 214 shows the applicant entered active duty this period on 17 April 2000, was honorably REFRAD on 30 September 2000, and transferred to an Oregon Army National Guard (ORARNG) unit. It also shows in – a. item 13, with continuation in item 18 (Remarks), the – * Army Service Ribbon * Expert Infantryman Badge * National Defense Service Medal * Army Achievement Medal (4th Award) * Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) * Army Lapel Button * Ranger Tab * Parachute Badge * Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal (3rd Award) * Pathfinder Badge * Noncommissioned Officer (NCO) Professional Development Ribbon with Numeral "3" * Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award) * Army Reserve Components Overseas Training Ribbon * Air Assault Badge b. item 14, the entry "NONE." 5. A DD Form 214, as corrected by a DD Form 215 issued on 21 August 2002, shows the applicant entered active duty this period on 26 August 2001, was honorably REFRAD on 2 May 2002, and transferred to an ORARNG unit. It also shows he was mobilized with his unit in support of Operation Joint Forge and he served in Bosnia from 18 September 2001 to 2 April 2002. It further shows in – a. item 13, with continuation in item 18, the – * Expert Infantryman Badge * Army Achievement Medal (5th Award) * Army Good Conduct Medal * Army Service Ribbon * Army Lapel Button * Ranger Tab * Parachute Badge * Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal (4th Award) * Pathfinder Badge * Army Reserve Components Overseas Training Ribbon * Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal * NCO Professional Development Ribbon with Numeral "4" * Armed Forces Reserve Medal with "M" and bronze "Ten-Year" Devices * North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) Medal * Air Assault Badge * Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award) * National Defense Service Medal b. item 14, the entry "NONE." 6. The applicant was promoted to sergeant major (SGM)/pay grade E-9 on 1 September 2002 in military occupational specialty (MOS) 11Z (Infantry Senior Sergeant). 7. A DD Form 214 shows the applicant entered active duty this period on 12 October 2003, was honorably REFRAD on 28 March 2005, and transferred to an ORARNG unit. It also shows he was ordered to active duty in support of Operation Iraqi Freedom (OIF) and that he served in Iraq in from 22 March 2004 to 20 January 2005. It further shows in – a. item 13, with continuation in item 18 and on a Continuation Page, the – * Bronze Star Medal * Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award) * Army Achievement Medal (5th Award) * Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal (4th Award) * National Defense Service Medal (2nd Award) * Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal (emphasis added) * Korea Defense Service Medal * Global War on Terrorism Service Medal * Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal * Armed Forces Reserve Medal with "M" (2nd Award) and "Ten-Year" Devices * NCO Professional Development Ribbon with Numeral "4" * Army Service Ribbon * Army Good Conduct Medal (emphasis added) * Overseas Service Bar * Army Reserve Components Overseas Training Ribbon * Combat Infantryman Badge * Expert Infantryman Badge * Parachutist Badge * Pathfinder Badge * Air Assault Badge * Ranger Tab b. item 14, the entry "NONE//NOTHING FOLLOWS." c. a DD Form 215, issued on 25 June 2007, corrected item 13 of his 28 March 2005 DD Form 214 to – * delete the – * Global War on Terrorism Expeditionary Medal * Army Good Conduct Medal * add the – * Iraq Campaign Medal * Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) * Army Reserve Components Overseas Training Ribbon d. a DD Form 215, issued on 27 July 2011, corrected item 13 of his 28 March 2005 DD Form 214 to add the – * NATO Medal * Drill Sergeant Identification Badge * Military Free Fall Parachutist Badge 8. A review of the applicant's military personnel records failed to reveal he completed any formal in-service (full-time attendance) training courses during the period of service (i.e., from 12 October 2003 through 28 March 2005) that is under review. 9. On 1 July 2013, the applicant submitted his request for award of the PH for injuries sustained in Iraq on 4 May 2004 to the U.S. Army Human Resources Command (HRC), Fort Knox, KY. In support of his claim he provided a personal statement, along with four letters and one sworn statement (from two officers and three NCOs who were in his unit), and a letter from a VA medical doctor. a. On 17 December 2013, the Assistant Chief, Plans and Operations Officer, Awards and Decorations Branch, HRC, informed the applicant that additional documentation was required for consideration of his request for award of the PH. Specifically, deployment orders and military medical documentation describing the diagnosis and treatment of the injuries caused by the enemy immediately after or close to the incident of 4 May 2004. He was also informed that the VA documents/diagnoses are not sufficient, in itself, to determine award of the PH. b. On 15 January 2014, the applicant provided a copy of his deployment orders to HRC and confirmed that there was no SF 600 or other documents explaining his wound because he was never treated by an American medical provider. c. On 14 February 2014, the applicant was informed by HRC that based on the information provided, there was no medical documentation that supported a relationship of combat to injury. A request for award of the PH has several regulatory requirements that were not met in his case. He did not meet the PH criteria per Army Regulation 600-8-22 (Military Awards), paragraph 2-8(h)(7). 10. On 19 August 2013, the applicant submitted a request for award of the PH for injuries sustained in Iraq on 4 May 2004 to the ABCMR. On 21 February 2014, he supplemented his request with evidence he had provided HRC, along with the HRC decision. On 17 November 2014, he further supplemented his request with a copy of the VA Progress Notes, dated 17 November 2014, that indicated the applicant's military history suggests (emphasis added) he was struck by a projectile (from an IED) in the right upper extremity and the extent of the wound was such that he would have required treatment by a medical officer, if one had been available. (A review of the VA Progress Notes fails to show the entry was made by a military or civilian medical doctor.) 11. In support of his request the applicant provides the following documents. a. A DA Form 2-1 (Personnel Qualification Record), prepared on 17 June 1999 with entries through 26 August 2001, but was not reviewed or signed by the applicant. It shows, in pertinent part, in – * item 9 (Awards, Decorations and Campaigns) and item 27 (Remarks) – * Army Service Ribbon * National Defense Service Medal * Army Achievement Medal (4th Award) * Expert Infantryman Badge * NCO Professional Development Ribbon with Numeral 3 * Drill Sergeant Identification Badge * Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal (4th Award) * Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award) * Ranger Tab * Parachute Badge * Air Assault Badge * Army Reserve Components Overseas Training Ribbon * Pathfinder Badge * Army Good Conduct Medal (1st Award) * Armed Forces Reserve Medal * Expert Marksmanship Qualification Badge with Rifle (M-16) Bar * State Awards (Item 27): Oregon National Guard (ORNG) – * ORNG Recruiter Ribbon (2nd Award) * ORNG Super Soldier Ribbon * ORNG Faithful Service Medal * item 17 (Civilian Education and Military Schools) and item 28 (Item Continuation) – * Infantry (MOS 11B), 13 Weeks, 1984 * Basic Airborne, 3 Weeks, 1984 * Jungle Warfare, 3 Weeks, 1984 * Special Forces Operations Course, 2 Weeks, 1985 * Interrogator, 4 Weeks, 1985 * Scout Indoctrination, 3 Weeks, 1986 * Survival, Evasion, Resistance and Escape, 2 Weeks, 1986 * Military Free Fall Parachute Course, 5 Weeks, 1986 * Ranger School, 8 Weeks, 1987 * Drill Sergeant Course, 8 Weeks, 1988 * Primary Leadership Development Course–Reserve Component (RC), 2 Weeks, 1989 * Basic NCO Course (BNCOC)–RC Common Core, 1 Week 1990 * Instructor Training Course, Non-Resident, 1992 * BNCOC–RC, Phase I, Non-Resident, 1993 * BNCOC–RC Phase II, 2 Weeks, 1993 * Advanced NCO Course (ANCOC)–RC Phase I, 2 Weeks, 1994 * ANCOC–RC Phase II, 2 Weeks, 1994 * Public Affairs, Master of Arts Degree, 6 Years, 1997 * Air Assault Course, 2 Weeks, 1998 * Pathfinder Course, 3 Weeks, 1997 * Special Operations Medical Sergeant Preparation Course, Non-Resident, 1999 * First Sergeants Course, 2 Weeks, 2001 b. A statement from former Staff Sergeant Eric P____, U.S. Army, dated 20 May 2015. (1) He states that he served in Iraq as an Iraqi National Guard embedded trainer from April 2004 to February 2005 and with the applicant in 2nd Battalion, 162nd Infantry, 1st Cavalry Division. He describes the austere living conditions of the primary base of operations (an old temporary bunker complex) and the daily routine of the unit's operations. (2) On 4 May 2004, he was in a convoy traveling from a local forward operating base to their bunker. He was a tank commander of the last vehicle and the applicant was in the vehicle directly in front of him. They were ambushed and hit with an IED. He observed the vehicle in front of him as it was lifted from the ground and then covered with smoke and debris. The gunner was evacuated due to multiple wounds. He states, "[The applicant] was at first unconscious and then dazed, but he refused to be evacuated so he could pursue the enemy. Later, when we reached the bunker, Captain E___ [an Iraqi officer and also the unit commander] treated him, to include removing a piece of shrapnel from his arm and giving him bed rest." c. A statement from a former Soldier, Simon G____, U.S. Army, dated 3 July 2015. (1) On 4 May 2004, he was a turret gunner in a High Mobility Multipurpose Wheeled Vehicle, (the third vehicle of a 4-vehicle convoy) with the 1st Cavalry Division in Iraq. The applicant was a passenger in the third vehicle and the mission that day was to take him to the Iraqi bunker. (2) He states they were ambushed and his vehicle was hit by an IED. He had multiple injuries and was unconscious, he was taken to the hospital, and treated for injuries to his hands, face, and eye. He was awarded the PH for his injuries. He states, "[the applicant] did not go to the hospital with me. It does not make sense to me that I received a Purple Heart and [the applicant] did not. We were injured at the same time in the same vehicle because of the same IED." 12. Army Regulation 600-8-22 provides policy, criteria, and administrative instructions concerning military awards and decorations. The PH is awarded for a wound sustained in action against an enemy or as a result of hostile action. Substantiating evidence must be provided to verify the wound was the result of hostile action, the wound must have required treatment by medical personnel, and the medical treatment must have been made a matter of official record. 13. Army Directive 2011-07 (Awarding of the Purple Heart), dated 18 March 2011, aligned Army policy for award of the PH with Department of Defense (DoD) Manual 1348.33, Volume 3 (Manual of Military Decorations and Awards: DoD-Wide Performance and Valor Awards; Foreign Awards, Military Awards to Foreign Personnel and U.S. Public Health Service Officers; and Miscellaneous Information), dated 23 November 2010. It provided clarifying guidance to ensure the uniform application of advancements in medical knowledge and treatment protocols when considering recommendations for award of the PH for concussions. a. Award of the PH may be made for wounds (including mild traumatic brain injury and concussive injuries) treated by a medical professional other than a medical officer, provided a medical officer includes a statement in the Soldier's medical record from a medical professional describing the extent of the wounds was such that they would have required treatment by a medical officer if one had been available to treat them. b. A medical officer is defined as a physician with officer rank. The following are medical officers: an officer of the Medical Corps of the Army, an officer of the Medical Corps of the Navy, or an officer in the Air Force designated as a medical officer in accordance with Title 10, U.S. Code, section 101. c. A medical professional is defined as a civilian physician or a physician extender. Physician extenders include nurse practitioners, physician assistants and other medical professionals qualified to provide independent treatment (for example, independent duty corpsmen and Special Forces medics). Basic corpsmen and medics (such as combat medics) are not physician extenders. 14. MILPER Message Number 11-125, dated 29 April 2011, announced the approval of Army Directive 2011-07 and provided clarifying guidance for advancements in medical knowledge and treatment protocols when considering recommendations for award of the PH for concussions (including traumatic brain and concussive injuries that do not result in the loss of consciousness). It did not change the standards for award of the PH for concussion injuries. 15. Army Regulation 600-8-22 also shows: a. The Iraq Campaign Medal (ICM) is authorized for award to members of the Armed Forces of the United States who have served in direct support of OIF. The area of eligibility encompasses all land area of the country of Iraq and contiguous water area out to 12 nautical miles and all air spaces above the land area of Iraq and above the contiguous water area out to 12 nautical miles. The ICM period of eligibility is on or after 19 March 2003 through 31 December 2011. (1) A bronze service star is authorized with this service medal for each Iraq campaign a member is credited with participating in. (2) Approved designated Iraq campaigns, in pertinent part, include the – * Transition of Iraq (2 May 2003 - 28 June 2004) * Iraqi Governance (29 June 2004 - 15 December 2005) b. The Overseas Service Ribbon (OSR) is awarded for successful completion of overseas tours. According to the Awards Branch at HRC, Iraq and Afghanistan are considered isolated areas where tour lengths have not been established by the DoD. Soldiers who serve 11 cumulative months in a 24-month period or 9 months continuous in Iraq or Afghanistan get credit for a completed short tour. 16. Army Regulation 635-5 (Personnel Separations - Separation Documents) prescribes the separation documents that must be prepared for Soldiers on retirement, discharge, REFRAD, or control of the Active Army. a. Chapter 2 contains guidance on the preparation of the DD Form 214. It states, in pertinent part, that the source documents for entering information on the DD Form 214 will be the Enlisted/Officer Record Brief (ERB/ORB), separation approval authority documentation, separation orders, or any other document authorized for filing in the OMPF. b. Paragraph 2-4 (Completing the DD Form 214) contains item-by-item instructions for completing the DD Form 214. The instructions show for: (1) item 13, list awards and decorations for all periods of service in the priority sequence specified in Army Regulation 600-8-22. Each entry will be verified by the Soldier's records; (2) item 14, from the ERB/ORB, list formal in-service (full-time attendance) training courses successfully completed during the period of service covered by the DD Form 214; and (3) item 18, when additional space is required, prepare a continuation sheet on bond paper. The continuation sheet will be titled "DD Form 214 Continuation" and – * include information from items 1–4b and the item being continued * be signed and dated by the Soldier and the authenticating official * be attached to each copy of the DD Form 214 c. Paragraph 2-4 (Issuing and reissuing a DD Form 214), in pertinent part, shows that once a DD Form 214 has been issued, do not reissue except when two DD Forms 215 have been issued and an additional correction is required. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. The applicant contends that his request for award of the PH should be reconsidered based on the previous evidence submitted and the two new statements he now provides, and that his final DD Form 214 should be corrected to show all of his awards and military education. 2. The applicant's claim to the PH is based on an incident that occurred in Iraq on 4 May 2004. The evidence of record shows the applicant was in the same vehicle as a Soldier who was injured and evacuated to a nearby aid station/ hospital. a. The applicant previously stated, "I was temporarily unconscious. When I regained consciousness, I had an intense headache, blurry vision, ringing in my ears, muffled hearing, and was nauseated. Once I was able to focus and realize what had happened, I noticed my gunner [the other Soldier] was injured." b. He previously stated that he was not evacuated for medical treatment of his injuries because he did not feel that he needed medical attention and that it was more important to locate and pursue the enemy. The evidence of record shows the convoy continued on to its destination (the bunker). He also stated that he could have requested a convoy for his medical evacuation after the fact, but this would have endangered the lives of others. c. The statement the applicant now provides from the Soldier who was injured and was in the same vehicle as the applicant was carefully considered. However, the Soldier was knocked unconscious, medically evacuated, and he did not (could not) offer testimony as to the applicant's injuries (emphasis added). d. The statement the applicant provides from the NCO in the trailing vehicle shows the applicant was "first unconscious and then dazed" and, when they reached the bunker, the commander removed a piece of shrapnel from the applicant's arm. However, such statement(s) is (are) insufficient as a basis to substantiate a claim to the PH. e. The applicant was a senior NCO in his unit and should have been aware of the process and procedures that were required to ensure Soldiers in the unit were recognized with the appropriate award(s). f. The applicant remained in Iraq more than 7 months after the incident that is under review. There is no evidence of any contemporaneous military medical record that documents the injuries he sustained on 4 May 2004 or that he was treated by a medical professional (emphasis added) at the time. g. There is no evidence of record that shows a request for award of the PH was submitted to the approving award authority in Iraq for a determination of the applicant's entitlement to the PH. h. The applicant's contention that the directive governing award of the PH does not dictate any time limit on the statement by a medical officer, if treatment was by other than a medical officer is noted. However, the evidence of record shows treatment by a medical professional is required (emphasis added). Again, there is no evidence of record that shows the applicant was treated by a medical professional (emphasis added). In addition, the directive shows that a military medical officer must provide a statement in the Soldier's medical record describing the extent of the wounds was such that they would have required treatment by a medical officer if one had been available to treat them. i. The applicant provides as evidence a notation from his VA Progress Notes, made more than 10 years after the incident under review, that a civilian medical provider made suggesting the applicant's injuries would have required medical treatment by a military medical officer. This is insufficient evidence to satisfy the requirement established in the DoD and Army directives. j. In view of all of the foregoing, the VA medical record and personal statements previously considered by the Board, along with the two new personal statements, fail to satisfy the strict requirements for award of the PH. 3. There is no evidence of record that shows the applicant completed any formal in-service (full-time attendance) training courses during the period of service (i.e., from 12 October 2003 through 28 March 2005) that is under review. 4. The evidence of record shows: a. the applicant qualified for award of the ICM, he participated in two campaigns during his service in Iraq, and he is authorized two bronze service stars for wear on his already-awarded ICM; and b. he qualified for award of the OSR based on serving more than nine (9) consecutive months in Iraq. 5. The Army regulation that governs the preparation of the DD Form 214 shows when two DD Forms 215 have been issued and an additional correction is required, a new DD Form 214 will be issued. 6. The applicant's 28 March 2005 DD Form 214 requires additional corrections. Consequently, the previously issued DD Form 214, Continuation Page, and two DD Forms 215 (issued on 25 June 2007 and 27 July 2011) should be voided and a new DD Form 214 issued showing the same information previously recorded, except that it should show all of his awards, as recommended below. BOARD VOTE: ________ ________ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ____X____ ____X____ ___X_____ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: 1. The Board determined that the evidence presented was sufficient to warrant amendment of the ABCMR's decision in Docket Number AR20140006453, dated 11 December 2014. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by: a. voiding his 28 March 2005 DD Form 214, the Continuation Page, and the two DD Forms 215 (issued on 25 June 2007 and 27 July 2011); and b. issuing a new DD Form 214 showing all of the information recorded on the previously issued DD Form 214, except that item 13 shall show the – * Bronze Star Medal * Army Commendation Medal (2nd Award) * Army Achievement Medal (5th Award) * Army Good Conduct Medal (2nd Award) * Army Reserve Components Achievement Medal (4th Award) * National Defense Service Medal (2nd Award) * Armed Forces Expeditionary Medal * Iraq Campaign Medal with 2 Bronze Service Stars * Global War on Terrorism Service Medal * Korea Defense Service Medal * Armed Forces Reserve Medal with "M" (2nd Award) Device and "Ten-Year" Device * Noncommissioned Officer Professional Development Ribbon with Numeral "4" * Army Service Ribbon * Overseas Service Ribbon * Army Reserve Components Overseas Training Ribbon * North Atlantic Treaty Organization Medal * Combat Infantryman Badge * Expert Infantryman Badge * Parachutist Badge * Military Free Fall Parachutist Badge * Pathfinder Badge * Air Assault Badge * Drill Sergeant Identification Badge * Ranger Tab * Overseas Service Bar 2. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to the Purple Heart and military education. _______ _ ___X____ ___ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20150006002 3 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1 ABCMR Record of Proceedings (cont) AR20150006002 4 ARMY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS 1