IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 September 2016 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150013796 BOARD VOTE: _________ _______ ________ GRANT FULL RELIEF ___x____ ___x____ ___x____ GRANT PARTIAL RELIEF ________ ________ ________ GRANT FORMAL HEARING ________ ________ ________ DENY APPLICATION 2 Enclosures 1. Board Determination/Recommendation 2. Evidence and Consideration IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 September 2016 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150013796 BOARD DETERMINATION/RECOMMENDATION: 1. The Board determined that the evidence presented is sufficient to warrant a recommendation for partial relief. As a result, the Board recommends that all Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected by amending item 30 of his DD Form 214 to add the SSN as listed on his application to this Board (i.e., the SSN -XX-XXXX). 2. The Board further determined that the evidence presented is insufficient to warrant a portion of the requested relief. As a result, the Board recommends denial of so much of the application that pertains to amending item 3 of his DD Form 214 by deleting the TIN and adding his SSN. ___________x______________ CHAIRPERSON I certify that herein is recorded the true and complete record of the proceedings of the Army Board for Correction of Military Records in this case. IN THE CASE OF: BOARD DATE: 6 September 2016 DOCKET NUMBER: AR20150013796 THE BOARD CONSIDERED THE FOLLOWING EVIDENCE: 1. Application for correction of military records (with supporting documents provided, if any). 2. Military Personnel Records and advisory opinions (if any). THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST, STATEMENT, AND EVIDENCE: 1. The applicant requests correction of his DD Form 214 (Armed Forces of the United States Report of Transfer or Discharge) to show his social security number (SSN) as "" instead of "." 2. The applicant states he did not have an SSN when he entered the Army so they gave him a temporary number. 3. The applicant provides his DD Form 214. CONSIDERATION OF EVIDENCE: 1. Title 10, U.S. Code, section 1552(b), provides that applications for correction of military records must be filed within 3 years after discovery of the alleged error or injustice. This provision of law also allows the Army Board for Correction of Military Records (ABCMR) to excuse an applicant’s failure to timely file within the 3-year statute of limitations if the ABCMR determines it would be in the interest of justice to do so. While it appears the applicant did not file within the time frame provided in the statute of limitations, the ABCMR has elected to conduct a substantive review of this case and, only to the extent relief, if any, is granted, has determined it is in the interest of justice to excuse the applicant’s failure to timely file. In all other respects, there are insufficient bases to waive the statute of limitations for timely filing. 2. The U.S. Armed Forces was still in the process of transitioning from the service number to the SSN at the time of the applicant's induction/enlistment processing. 3. In connection with his induction into the Army of the United States, he completed a DD Form 398 (Statement of Personal History). He listed his SSN as "." 4. He was inducted into the Army of the United States on 8 August 1969. Item 2 (SN) of his DD Form 47 (Record of Induction) listed the entry "" over his name. 5. His DA Form 20 (Enlisted Qualification Record), which was created upon his entry on active duty, listed his SSN as "." 6. His service records contain multiple personnel, legal, medical, and other documents that listed his SSN as "" and also as "." He authenticated some of these documents by placing his signature where required. 7. He was honorably released from active duty on 6 August 1971. Item 3 (SSN) of his DD Form 214 listed his SSN as "." 8. Army Regulation 600-2 (Name and Birth Data, Social Security Account, and Temporary Identification Number (TIN)), in effect at the time, prescribes the procedures used for recording, issuing or changing personnel information normally used as a means of identification. a. Chapter 4 (TIN) prescribed the procedures for issuing a TIN as a means of personnel identification for those individuals being processed for military service who did not have an SSN. The number "9" was designated as the first number of the 9-digit TIN. b. The TIN was to be entered in pencil on enlistment/induction records in those items reserved for recording the SSN at the time of pre-enlistment or pre-induction processing. Upon receipt of an SSN card by the individual prior to his entrance into the active Army, the pencil entry of the TIN was to be replaced by permanent entry of the SSN. c. Where the individual entered active duty without an SSN, the TIN was to be entered as a permanent entry on all records. Upon receipt of an SSN, the TIN entry was to be lined out and the SSN entered. 9. Information available from the Social Security Administration shows that SSNs beginning with 800-999 are not valid SSNs; no numbers above 799 have ever been issued. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: 1. Many Soldiers did not have a SSN (or did not have an official document confirming their SSN) when they were inducted into the Army of the United States or enlisted in the Regular Army at the time; thus, they were issued a TIN. Soldiers in this category would have been required to apply for a social security card at the time of their induction/enlistment. Due to the short duration of some of these Soldiers' service, many apparently did not receive their card before they were separated (or were unable to produce a document confirming their SSN before separation). As such, they were identified with a TIN throughout their service and it was recorded on their DD Form 214 when they separated. 2. The applicant in this case listed an SSN upon his entry on active duty. Nevertheless, it appears his servicing personnel specialist(s) assigned him a TIN. This TIN, together with his SSN, were used throughout his military service. For historical purposes, the Army has an interest in maintaining the accuracy of its records. The data contained in those records should reflect the conditions and circumstances that existed at the time the records were created. 3. Nevertheless, based on the evidence of record, the evidence would support making an entry in item 30 (Remarks) of his DD Form 214 showing his SSN as indicated on the DD Form 398 and on his application to this Board. //NOTHING FOLLOWS//