PART II - APPLICATION DATA (Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy) 1. Character of Discharge: General, Under Honorable Conditions 2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 3. Authority for separation: a. Regulation: Chapter 14, AR 635-200 b. Reason: Misconduct 4. Prior review(s): 000804 PART III - SERVICE HISTORY SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review 1. Service data: 2. Awards and decorations: ASR a. Period entered for: 4 Years C/Ach b. Entry date: 970325 c. Age: 20 Years DOB: 760626 d. Educational level: 13 Years e. Aptitude area score: GT: 111 3. Highest grade achieved: f. Length of Service: E3 2 Year(s) 6 Month(s) 28 Day(s) 4. Performance evaluations: NONE PART III - SERVICE HISTORY SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued 5. Periods of unauthorized absence: NONE Status Inclusive dates AWOL Mil conf Civil conf Other 6. Nonjudicial punishment: Date Offense(s) 981207 FOLO by SFC (981024); fail to go (981002)(summarized); 990701 DOLO by NCO (not in file); 990723 With the intent to defraud, wrongfully and unlawfully draw checks without sufficient funds (990701); failure to pay just debts, two specifications (990701-990714) and (990623-990714); fail to go, two specifications (990601) and (990518); DOLO by CPT (990512); and DOLO by lSG (990512). 7. Court-Martial data: NONE a. SCM: Date Offense(s) b. SPCM: Date Offense(s) c. GCM: Date Offense(s) 8. Remarks: Bar to Reenlistment (990108) SECTION B - Prior Service Data NONE Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. Evidence of record shows that on 23 July 1999, the unit commander notified the applicant of initiation of separation action under the provisions of Chapter l4, AR 635-200, by reason of misconduct—patterns of misconduct, with a general, under honorable conditions discharge. She was advised of her rights. The applicant consulted with legal counsel, was advised of the impact of the discharge action, and submitted a statement in her own behalf. The unit commander subsequently recommended separation from the service and waiver of further rehabilitative efforts. On 5 October 1999, the separation authority waived further rehabilitative efforts and directed that the applicant be discharged with a characterization of service of general, under honorable conditions. b. On 22 October 1999, the applicant was discharged. At the time of discharge, the applicant had completed 2 years, 6 months, and 28 days of active military service. 2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action: Army Regulation 635-200 sets forth the basic authority for the separation of enlisted personnel. Chapter l4 establishes policy and prescribes procedures for separating members for misconduct. Specific categories include minor disciplinary infractions, a pattern of misconduct, commission of a serious offense, to include abuse of illegal drugs, convictions by civil authorities and desertion or absence without leave. Action will be taken to separate a member for misconduct when it is clearly established that rehabilitation is impractical or unlikely to succeed. Army policy states that an under other than honorable conditions discharge is normally considered appropriate, but a general discharge under honorable conditions or an honorable discharge may be granted. SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS 1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel. As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293. 2. Exhibit(s) submitted: A-1: DD Form 293, dated 020520, with 3 enclosure(s). A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE B-l: Other Documents: NONE PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED) SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable): b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable): PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits 1. Review/hearing information: a. Type requested: ( ) Records review ( X ) Hearing b. Type Held: ( )Records review ( X ) Hearing ( ) Tender Offer c. Review/hearing location and date: Atlanta, GA on 19 March 2003. d. Appearance by: Applicant ( X ) Yes ( ) No Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No e. Applicant testified: ( X ) Yes ( ) No f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No 2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing: 11 documents. PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS 1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. ( ) Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as follows: ( X ) Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as follows: Board Issue: (7) The characterization of service is too harsh. b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( X ) Change of Reason 2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on issues of propriety and/or equity: a. Propriety: The applicant has not submitted an issue of propriety and the ADRB has not otherwise relied upon an issue of propriety to change the discharge. b. Equity: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI, Paragraph 1, above. (7) The issue is accepted. The Board carefully examined the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review and heard her testimony. There was a full consideration of all faithful and honorable service as well as the infractions of discipline, the extent thereof, and the seriousness of the offenses. Although the Board does not condone the applicant’s misconduct, it determined that she presented evidence of sufficient meritorious post service conduct and accomplishments to overcome the discrediting entries in her service record. Given the above, the Board found that the characterization of service is now inequitable. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of characterization of service to fully honorable. (1-6) The issues are rejected. The Board noted the applicant’s contentions, however, the Board found sufficient misconduct to substantiate the narrative reason for discharge. The record shows that the applicant accepted a summarized Article 15 for disobeying a lawful order from a noncommissioned officer and for failing to go to her appointed place of duty. She also accepted nonjudicial punishment under Article 15’s for failing to go to her appointed place of duty, disobeying lawful orders, writing bad checks, and failing to pay her just debts. She was also counseled on numerous occasions for disobeying lawful orders, failing to repair, and using her pregnancy as a means of escaping work. Her misconduct resulted in a bar to reenlistment. Individuals are assigned RE codes based on their service records or the reason for discharge. The applicant was appropriately assigned an RE code of 3 in conjunction with her reason for discharge. An RE Code of 3 indicates that the applicant requires a waiver prior to being allowed to reenlist. The Board found no bases upon which to change the applicant’s RE code. If the applicant desires to reenlist, she should contact the local recruiter to determine her eligibility to reenlist. Those individuals can best advise a former service member as to the needs of the Army at the time, and are required to process waivers of RE codes. 3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote 1. Board conclusion(s): The discharge was: ( X ) Proper. ( ) Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to                                     . ( ) Improper as to reason. Change reason to                         under                      . ( ) Equitable. ( X ) Inequitable as to characterization. Change characterization to Honorable. ( ) Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to                        under                                 . ( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to                      under                         . 2. Voting record: Change No Change Reason 0 5 Characterization 4 1 The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right corner of this document. Department of the Army Review Boards Agency ATTN: Promulgation Team 1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor Arlington, VA 22202-4508 3. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified                            Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION SECTION A - DIRECTIVE TO: ARBA Support Division-St Louis Date: 28 March 2003 The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant named in Part I directs that the ARBA Support Division-St Louis issue a new DD Form 2l4 to the applicant which reflects the following directed change(s): ( X ) Change characterization of discharge to Honorable. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: SPURGEON A. MOORE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: JOHN F. LONG Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant INDEX RECORD: AR Number: 2002073756 INDEX NUMBERS: A9406 Date of Review: 030319 A9222 Character of Service: GD A0113 Date of Discharge: 991022 Authority: AR 635-200 C14 Reason: A6750 Results of Board Action/ Vote/Affirmation: HD 4-1 A PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name  Reason Characterization CHANGE NC HON UHC NC UNCHAR 1. Mbr      X  X            2. Mbr      X  X            3. Mbr      X  X            4. Mbr      X          X     5. Mbr      X  X