PART II - APPLICATION DATA (Note: Part I deleted under the Privacy Act on Reading Room copy) 1. Character of Discharge: Under Other Than Honorable Conditions 2. Date of discharge (or REFRAD): 950425 3. Authority for separation: a. Regulation: Chapter 8-26q, NGR 600-200 b. Reason: Misconduct-Unsatisfactory Participation 4. Prior review(s): NONE PART III - SERVICE HISTORY SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review 1. Service data: 2. Awards and decorations: NDSM a. Period entered for: 8 Years(6 yr. ext.) ASR b. Entry date: 880323 (910209) C/Ach c. Age: 17 Years DOB: 700805 L/C d. Educational level: 10 Years e. Aptitude area score: GT: 100 3. Highest grade achieved: f. Length of Service: E4 7 Year(s) 1 Month(s) 3 Day(s) 4. Performance evaluations: NONE PART III - SERVICE HISTORY SECTION A - Period of Service Under Review - Continued 5. Periods of unauthorized absence: NONE Status Inclusive dates AWOL Mil conf Civil conf Other 6. Nonjudicial punishment: NONE Date Offense(s) 7. Court-Martial data: NONE a. SCM: Date Offense(s) b. SPCM: Date Offense(s) c. GCM: Date Offense(s) 8. Remarks: NONE SECTION B - Prior Service Data Other discharge(s): Service From To Type Discharge ADT 880502 880923 Honorable (Concurrent service) PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW SECTION A-ANALYST’S ASSESSMENT l. Facts and Circumstances: a. Evidence of record shows that on 25 April 1995 the applicant was discharged from the U.S. Army National Guard and the Reserve of the Army. The Adjutant General, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania ORDERS 077-042, discharged the applicant from the Army National Guard and the Reserve of the Army under the provisions of NGR 600-200, Chapter 8-26q, by reason of misconduct-unsatisfactory participation with an under other than honorable conditions discharge. Under the provisions of NGR 600-200, Chapter 6-44b, he was reduced to the grade of private/E-1 by reason of misconduct, effective 24 April 1995. The record also contains a properly constituted NGB Form 22 (Report of Separation and Record of Service) discharging the applicant from the Pennsylvania Army National Guard. His NGB Form 22 also indicates that he was discharged under the provisions of Chapter 8-26q, NGR 600-200 by reason of misconduct-unsatisfactory participation, with a characterization of service of under other than honorable conditions. The specific facts and circumstances leading to the applicant’s discharge are not contained in the available records. b. On 25 April 1995, the applicant was discharged from the Pennsylvania Army National Guard and the Reserve of the Army. At the time of discharge, the applicant had completed 7 years, 1 month, and 3 days of active military service. 2. Legal/Regulatory Basis for Separation Action: National Guard Regulation (NGR) 600-200 and Army Regulation 135-91 govern procedures covering enlisted personnel management of the Army National Guard. Chapter 8 of NGR 600-200 covers, in pertinent part, reasons for discharge and separation of enlisted personnel from the State Army Reserve National Guard. Paragraph 8-26(q), then in effect, provided that individuals could be separated for acts or patterns of misconduct. Army Regulation 135-91, in pertinent part, stated that a member was an unsatisfactory participant when an enlisted member accrued nine or more unexcused absences from scheduled drills during a 1 year period. In conjunction with State Army National Guard discharge regulations, AR 135-178, Chapter 7, prescribed procedures to discharge Reserve of the Army enlisted personnel for misconduct. The service of an individual discharged for misconduct was normally characterized as under other than honorable conditions. SECTION B-APPLICANT’S SUBMISSIONS 1. Issue(s) of propriety and/or equity submitted by applicant or counsel. As stated on applicant’s DD Form 293. 2. Exhibit(s) submitted: A-1: DD Form 293, dated 020726, with one (1) enclosure(s). A-2: Counsel Issues: NONE B-l: Other Documents: NONE PART IV - PREHEARING REVIEW (CONTINUED) SECTION C - Medical and/or Legal Advisory Opinion Referred to ( ) Medical Advisor ( ) Legal Advisor a. Medical prehearing comments (if applicable): b. Legal prehearing comments (if applicable): PART V - SUMMARY OF HEARING SECTION A-Attendees and exhibits 1. Review/hearing information: a. Type requested: ( X ) Records review ( ) Hearing b. Type Held: ( X )Records review ( ) Hearing ( ) Tender Offer c. Review/hearing location and date: Washington, DC on 7 November 2002. d. Appearance by: Applicant ( ) Yes ( X ) No Counsel ( ) Yes ( X ) No e. Applicant testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No f. Counsel presentation: ( ) Yes ( X ) No g. Witness(es) testified: ( ) Yes ( X ) No 2. Exhibit(s) submitted at hearing: PART VI - ISSUES AND FINDINGS 1. a. Applicant's issue(s) of propriety and/or equity: ( X ) Same as those listed on DD Form 293 and Part IV, Section A of this case report and directive. ( ) Revised issue(s) furnished in writing by applicant as follows: ( X ) Additional issue(s) identified during review/hearing as follows: Board Issue: (2) The characterization of service was too harsh. b. Request: ( X ) Recharacterization ( ) Change of Reason 2. Finding(s), conclusion(s), and reason(s) for the Board's decision(s) on issues of propriety and/or equity: a. Propriety: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI, Paragraph 1, above. (1) See Paragraph 3, below. b. Equity: The parenthetical number(s) below correspond(s) to the issue number(s) on the DD Form 293, or in Part VI, Paragraph 1, above. (2) The issue is accepted. The Board carefully examined the applicant’s record of service during the period of enlistment under review. There was a full consideration of all faithful and honorable service as well as the infractions of discipline, the extent thereof, and the seriousness of the offenses. The Board found that the length and quality of the applicant’s service partially mitigated his misconduct. In view of the foregoing, the Board determined that the characterization of service was inequitable. Accordingly, the Board voted to grant relief in the form of an upgrade of characterization of service to general, under honorable conditions. The Board determined that the reason for discharge was proper and equitable and voted not to change it. 3. Response(s) to item(s) not addressed as decisional issue(s): Inasmuch as the Board voted to grant the full relief requested, response to the remaining issue is neither required nor rendered. PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION A - Conclusions/Decisions/Vote 1. Board conclusion(s): The discharge was: ( X ) Proper. ( ) Improper as to characterization. Change characterization to                                     . ( ) Improper as to reason. Change reason to                         under                      . ( ) Equitable. ( X ) Inequitable as to NG and USAR characterization. Change characterization to General, Under Honorable Conditions. ( ) Inequitable as to reason. Change reason to                        under                                 . ( ) Both proper and equitable, but characterization/reason for separation cited was an administrative/clerical error and should be changed to                      under                         . 2. Voting record: Change No Change Reason 0 5 Characterization 3 2 The names and votes of the members of the Board are recorded in Part IX of this document and can be obtained by writing to the address below. The request must contain the CASE NO. located in the upper right corner of this document. Department of the Army Review Boards Agency ATTN: Promulgation Team 1941 Jefferson Davis Highway, 2nd Floor Arlington, VA 22202-4508 3. Minority views: NONE PART VII - BOARD ACTION SECTION B - Verification and Authentication Case report reviewed and verified                            Ms. McKim-Spilker Case Reviewing Official PART VIII - DIRECTIVE/CERTIFICATION SECTION A - DIRECTIVE Thru: Chief, National Guard Bureau Date: 12 November 2002 To: Adjutant General, State of Pennsylvania The Army Discharge Review Board, established under the provisions of Section 30, Public Law 346, 78th Congress, 22 June 1944 and codified as Title 10, United States Code, Section 1553, in the case of the applicant named in Part I recommends that the applicant be considered for a change of his discharge by the Adjutant General, State of Pennsylvania, with issuance of a new NGB Form 22, as follows: ( X ) Characterization of NG and USAR discharge be changed to General, Under Honorable Conditions. ( X ) Other (see remarks below). Remarks: This action entails voiding PAARNG ORDERS 077-042 discharging the applicant from the PAARNG and Reserve of the Army with a UD; and issuing a new order discharging the applicant from the PAARNG and Reserve of the Army with a GD. SECTION B - CERTIFICATION Approval Authority: SPURGEON A. MOORE Colonel, U.S. Army President, Army Discharge Review Board Official: JOHN F. LONG Lieutenant Colonel, U.S. Army Chief, Secretary Recorder EXHIBITS: A - Application for review of discharge C - Other B - Material submitted by applicant INDEX RECORD: AR Number: 2002077202 INDEX NUMBERS: A9406 Date of Review: 021107 A9218 Character of Service: UD A0113 Date of Discharge: 950425 Authority: NGR 600-200, C8 Reason: A6750 Results of Board Action/ Vote/Affirmation: GD 3-2 A PART IX - VOTING RECORD Name  Reason Characterization CHANGE NC HON UHC NC UNCHAR 1. LTC SHAW, MARY E. Mbr      X      X        2. Mbr      X          X     3. Mbr      X      X        4. Mbr      X      X        5. PO      X          X